Scribe
Legend
As I have made clear a few times, no, they shouldn't be able to either.I mean you could just play a wizard if that's your jam.
Removal of limits and restrictions have lead to one of the most apparent system flaws of 5e.
As I have made clear a few times, no, they shouldn't be able to either.I mean you could just play a wizard if that's your jam.
Why do you hate it when other people have fun?
I'm going to be completely honest with you, I just thought it would be kind of funny to make that post.Why do you hate it when other people have fun?
Like most of D&D's villain stable, he's perfectly capable of doing that one this own.If your fighter was level 40 or 50, I'd totally let him do that to Orcus. Orcus, though, is level 30ish(CR 26) and someone 10 levels or more lower than Orcus isn't going to be capable of making him look that inept.
Not that hard really. It’s how many levels of each that seems to be the contention.Getting the D&D community to agree on whether or not D&D is gonzo high fantasy or gritty low fantasy is like getting a thousand cats to do the same thing.
It hasn't been my experience, but if you do get a consensus, let me know. The game supports both extremes in theory, but in practice, it's a little bit of column A, and a little bit of column B, and the middle ground seems kind of muddy.Not that hard really. It’s how many levels of each that seems to be the contention.
Getting the D&D community to agree on whether or not D&D is gonzo high fantasy or gritty low fantasy is like getting a thousand cats to do the same thing.
The real contention is those low levels. They get the most playtesting, adventures, and table time. It’s an envious position.It hasn't been my experience, but if you do get a consensus, let me know. The game supports both extremes in theory, but in practice, it's a little bit of column A, and a little bit of column B, and the middle ground seems kind of muddy.