The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread


log in or register to remove this ad

Snarf Zagyg

Notorious Liquefactionist
The only thing you can count on in life, death, taxes, and whiny ass internet posts about bards.

3bf7638cb13c5ccdb8ee89f2c8b7e43087fbc1b3.gif
 

CleverNickName

Limit Break Dancing
Nah. Rangers are forest rogues, not bow fighters.
Like I said, y'all aren't ready.

Paladins are just fighters who went to church. Once.
Barbarians are just angry fighters.
I considered for a moment whether the monk was actually a fighter, but settled on rogue because honestly? It isn't that good at fighting but I have felt robbed after playing one.
 

overgeeked

B/X Known World
Like I said, y'all aren't ready.

Paladins are just fighters who went to church. Once.
Barbarians are just angry fighters.
I considered for a moment whether the monk was actually a fighter, but settled on rogue because honestly? It isn't that good at fighting but I have felt robbed after playing one.
Exactly. Rangers are forest rogues. You always feel robbed after playing one.
 

prabe

Tension, apprension, and dissension have begun
Supporter
I considered for a moment whether the monk was actually a fighter, but settled on rogue because honestly? It isn't that good at fighting but I have felt robbed after playing one.
The monk--in 5e at least--is passable fighting defensively and as a striker, and so good at trivializing bosses it warps the game. IME and IMO, having played a monk and having one in both the campaigns I'm running.
 






Remove ads

Top