D&D General have we had a player race of undead?

MGibster

Legend
I'd just go the World of Warcraft route. The Forsaken are former humans taken from their graves and made into more undead. Something like that should work just fine for D&D. You could have a whole nation of these undead people.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Clint_L

Hero
I'd just go the World of Warcraft route. The Forsaken are former humans taken from their graves and made into more undead. Something like that should work just fine for D&D. You could have a whole nation of these undead people.
That's basically Laudna's backstory in Critical Role.

Though...this is making me wonder why WotC has been so reticent to add a straight-up undead playable species, similar to the Forsaken. It's a pretty popular fantasy archetype.
 

Mind of tempest

(he/him)advocate for 5e psionics
There was an Unearth Arcana with a Revenant type. Reborn?

And 4e had a feat that let you be a Revenant and like four ways to be a Vampire.
I'm not sure how a life form could be undead from birth to death - isn't that contradictory?

Explorer's Guide to Wildemount added Hollow Ones as an official D&D race. They are people who have been killed and subsequently become "beings whose souls have left for the afterlife, yet whose bodies still retain a fragment of their former selves." Marisha Rey's current character on Critical Role, Laudna, is a Hollow One. I like the concept a lot, especially the Unsettling Presence ability: "As an action, you can unsettle a creature you can see within 15 feet of you. The target has disadvantage on the next saving throw it makes within the next minute. Constructs, undead, and creatures that can’t be frightened are immune to this feature. Once you use this feature, you can’t use it again until you finish a long rest."

I don't know how you would have undead that is not derived from a formerly living being. Isn't the whole concept of undeath something that lived, died, and then came back but without all of its previous biological functions intact? If something was born, grew up, etc. how would it differ from a living being?
the nightwalker was always undead so a lesser one of them?
Wouldn't that just be Negative Energy Elementals?
would that not be an element rather than undead?
There is the Dhampier from Van Richten's Guide, but they might be listed as humanoid and not undead.
that comes under the human mutant category and I got bored of them a long time ago
Did you ever see the Ghostwalk setting?
ghostwalk?
Undead from birth is a contradiction. Two of the fundamental traits of the undead is that they are the remnants of formerly living creatures, reanimated by negative energy, and that they don't produce new life. It's fairly definitional.

That being the case, rather than a creature that's born undead, would you accept a species with an innate affinity for negative energy and the Shadowfell? Because from a character flavor perspective, the shadar-kai may be your closest hit. They're your gothiest of goths when it comes to PC species aesthetic.
to elf, elves eat everything it is unpleasant
I'd just go the World of Warcraft route. The Forsaken are former humans taken from their graves and made into more undead. Something like that should work just fine for D&D. You could have a whole nation of these undead people.
those were ex-life, if something animates things to unlife logically it could form something that is its perfect mirror doing all that life does.
That's basically Laudna's backstory in Critical Role.

Though...this is making me wonder why WotC has been so reticent to add a straight-up undead playable species, similar to the Forsaken. It's a pretty popular fantasy archetype.
undeath has to be evil for some reason, I do not know why but it has to be evil rather than dangerous.



would it help if I tried to reverse engineer where I got the idea from?
 

Though...this is making me wonder why WotC has been so reticent to add a straight-up undead playable species, similar to the Forsaken. It's a pretty popular fantasy archetype.
It's mechanical, the same reason they where reluctant to add construct PCs. The common healing spells don't work on creatures with the undead type, putting them at a significant disadvantage.

Eventually WotC did the autognome as constructs, with a rather clumsy cludge to fix the healing. You could do the same for undead PCs.
 


Mind of tempest

(he/him)advocate for 5e psionics
It's mechanical, the same reason they where reluctant to add construct PCs. The common healing spells don't work on creatures with the undead type, putting them at a significant disadvantage.

Eventually WotC did the autognome as constructs, with a rather clumsy cludge to fix the healing. You could do the same for undead PCs.
clumsy is as good compared to none, also why does magical healing, often from the gods you would think it would not care given how nebulous healing is as a term.
Would a stillborn creature who, for some reason, still grows and gets older work?
no more like something that is always undead, maybe it once live in it distant past but it became a species of unlife.
 

why does magical healing, often from the gods you would think it would not care given how nebulous healing is as a term.
RAW: That's what the spell description says.

Lore: Going back to 3rd edition (at least), healing is the application of "positive energy" which is harmful to undead. In 3rd edition undead can be healed with "negative energy" which is harmful to the living.
 

Tales and Chronicles

Jewel of the North, formerly know as vincegetorix
clumsy is as good compared to none, also why does magical healing, often from the gods you would think it would not care given how nebulous healing is as a term.

no more like something that is always undead, maybe it once live in it distant past but it became a species of unlife.
Then Vryloka and Shades from 4e would fit the bil.
 



Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top