The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[CleverNickName]

Maybe try this one?

​

full body visible, p!ink dressed as dungeons and dragons character in full plate armor, holding the helmet, holding a halberd, looking at the viewer, portrait, photographic quality, realistic, highly detailed, 8k, full-length frame, high detail, diffused soft lighting, shallow depth of field, sharp focus, cinematic lighting.​

 

[Thourne]

but then it wouldn't be accurate so which is it? Do you want to know if it's actually P!nk or do you want accuracy?

I am fairly sure there are more revealing armor options. The question is does the AI know that

 

[Thourne]

Maybe try this one?

​

full body visible, p!ink dressed as dungeons and dragons character in full plate armor, holding the helmet, holding a halberd, looking at the viewer, portrait, photographic quality, realistic, highly detailed, 8k, full-length frame, high detail, diffused soft lighting, shallow depth of field, sharp focus, cinematic lighting.​

I am seeing this turning into some bizarro version of Madlibs but for computer art!

 

[trappedslider]

Maybe try this one?

​

full body visible, p!ink dressed as dungeons and dragons character in full plate armor, holding the helmet, holding a halberd, looking at the viewer, portrait, photographic quality, realistic, highly detailed, 8k, full-length frame, high detail, diffused soft lighting, shallow depth of field, sharp focus, cinematic lighting.​

I made this one before you post

and some times the AI ignores parts of the prompt

Me personally, I don't care who it is. I've never really been in the mindset of seeing the real person behind the character even in movies and shows. I actually find it a little uncomfortable that these programs are allowing the option to choose specific people to integrate into these images.

so you just wanted to be a pain

I am fairly sure there are more revealing armor options. The question is does the AI know that

yes...yes it does even if you include SFW and as a negative prompt: NSFW

I am seeing this turning into some bizarro version of Madlibs but for computer art!

That's actually the best way to describe it that I've seen lol

 

[Thourne]

yes...yes it does even if you include SFW and as a negative prompt: NSFW

I actually meant less concealing ACTUAL armor lol but I see how it can be taken that way

 

[Thourne]

and man, the heels get me every time...here is your warrior...in 6" stilettos. Lol

 

[CleverNickName]

and some times the AI ignores parts of the prompt
View attachment 278474

That's some decent-looking armor and weaponry! I bet if you tweak the prompt a bit, you can get that same image but with p!ink in the portrait, with the helmet tucked underneath her right arm.

 

[Thourne]

That's some decent-looking armor and weaponry! I bet if you tweak the prompt a bit, you can get that same image but with p!ink in the portrait, with the helmet tucked underneath her right arm.

Yah the bottom one is decent. I just wish he looked less, "I just left the spa to attend this battle".

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

Yah the bottom one is decent. I just wish he looked less, "I just left the spa to attend this battle".

It's the four-step process.

Mani-Pedi-Facial-Slaughter.

Or, as my good friend Kronan the off-brand Barbarian always used to tell me, "Snarf, ya gotta look good to kill good."

 

[Thourne]

It's the four-step process.

Mani-Pedi-Facial-Slaughter.

Or, as my good friend Kronan the off-brand Barbarian always used to tell me, "Snarf, ya gotta look good to kill good."

but if looks could kill you'd get a 2for right? Or 1/2 off your next wax at least.