Picard Season 3

Yeah, it is entirely unrealistic for it to happen that fast, but hat said - IIRC, there are probably 1-3 TNG episodes where someone is undergoing some visual physical changes (like aging or turning into an alien) and it gets undone with nothing more than an injection of the antidote. No surgery required and you can watch the reversal live.
Started in TOS. They beam down to a planet and are affected by strange radiation that starts aging the entire landing party, except for Chekov, who saw a dead body and ran away screaming. Cured by an injection of, I believe, adrenaline.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

There are a lot of tasks that need doing to keep a ship running long term that can be ignored if you only need it to work for a few hours - you don't need to worry about routine maintenance or shift changes. You might worry about damage control, but if there is nobody available to do it you just have to hope for the best and try not to get damaged.

It has been clear for a long time in Trek that the minimum crew complement is a lot less than the optimal crew complement. As in, a couple of orders of magnitude less.


From the delta quadrant, presumably EDIT: explicitly by transwarp conduit.


Borg queens were introduced in Star Trek: First Contact (the film), and have been seen in Voyager, and previous seasons of Picard. EDIT: It is not clear to what extent the various borg queens are the same individual - several bodies have been destroyed, but how much continuity of mindstate there is between them is an open question. Except that the one in the previous season of Picard was definitely separate because she was from an alternate timeline (and became decidedly less Borg-like).


They were severely damaged by Janeway in the Voyager finale. How severely was not clear (in or out of universe) until now.

Cheers couldn't finish S1 of voyager. I was wondering if that Queen specifically was in previous trek I haven't seen. Because if her wounds.

I've seen First Contact and most of TNG.
 

I consider that to be a good sign. It meant the writers of this show did not want to bind the writers of a possible future Captain 7 show. If they thought there was no chance of its happening, that would not have been a concern.
The Star Trek: The Next Next Generation show seems a bit unlikely. You have three "stars" that might be unwilling to sign up for a long term show. And to do yet another season of a Star Trek show where the plot is save the Federation...again...might not appeal to all the actors. Though if the money is right.....
 

Cheers couldn't finish S1 of voyager
Fair enough. In the grand Star Trek tradition it gets a lot better after the first season or two, but OTOH even at its best it mostly wastes the interesting premise so I can understand people's not wanting to watch it.

I was wondering if that Queen specifically was in previous trek I haven't seen. Because if her wounds.
Ah I see. I do not think it can be physically the same body we saw in Endgame; I had not remembered the detail, but I have just read the summary of the episode on Memory Alpha and apparently we see her dead before the station she is on explodes.

Rather, I think that her condition was representative of the condition of the Borg as a whole.

The Star Trek: The Next Next Generation show seems a bit unlikely. You have three "stars" that might be unwilling to sign up for a long term show
Any spinoff series is obviously subject to contract negotiations with the leads.

That said, I am not sure what you mean by "long term" - we are obviously not going to get seven seasons of 23 episodes of this (or anything else ever again, unless there is another significant shift in the TV landscape), but 1-3 seasons of ten episodes each is hardly an unfathomable commitment.

And to do yet another season of a Star Trek show where the plot is save the Federation...again...might not appeal to all the actors.
Who said anything about saving the Federation again?
 




That doesn't mean every series has to be. Strange New Worlds isn't, neither is Lower Decks.

True but it’s not a totally unfair characterization either. DS9 dealt with existential threats. So did Voyager with the borg. Discovery was based on existential threats. Picard too.

It’s a pretty common thread.
 

True but it’s not a totally unfair characterization either. DS9 dealt with existential threats. So did Voyager with the borg. Discovery was based on existential threats. Picard too.

It’s a pretty common thread.
Sure, but it's only Picard and Discovery that make them their central identity.
 

Sure, but it's only Picard and Discovery that make them their central identity.
It's because they are over-serialized. I would say that it's because they don't have nearly as many episodes as the older shows did, but as you say Lower Decks and Strange New Worlds are in the same boat regarding run time.
 

Remove ads

Top