Planescape Planescape Pre-order Page Shows Off The Books!

You can now pre-order Planescape: Adventures in the Multiverse from D&D Beyond. The set comes out on October 17th.

Scroll down through the comments to see more various peeks at the books!

Planescape: Adventures in the Multiverse

An adventure setting spanning the infinite realities of the world’s greatest roleplaying game

www.dndbeyond.com

• Discover 2 new backgrounds, the Gate Warden & the Planar Philosopher, to build planar characters in the D&D Beyond character builder
• Channel 7 otherworldly feats, new intriguing magic spells & more powered by planar energies
• Explore 12 new ascendant factions, each with distinct cosmic ideologies
• Face over 50 unusual creatures including planar incarnates, hierarch modrons, and time dragons in the Encounter Builder
• Journey across the Outlands in an adventure for characters levels 3-10 and 17
• Adds adventure hooks, encounter tables, maps of Sigil and the Outlands & more to your game

This 3 books set comprises:

• Sigil and the Outlands: a setting book full of planar character options with details on the fantastic City of Doors, descriptions of the Outlands, the gate-towns that lead to the Outer planes, and more
• Turn of the Fortunes Wheel: an adventure set in Sigil and the Outlands designed for character levels 3-10 with a jump to level 17
• Morte’s Planar Parade: Follow Morte as he presents over 50 inhabitants of the Outer Plane, including incarnates, hierarch modrons, time dragons, and more with their stats and descriptions

 

[DavyGreenwind]

LGS's are going to get royally screwed. The price absurd.

I desided that I was going to try the Digital + Physical Bundle, which apparently comes with extra digital stuff like Modron Dice and special character sheets.

List price is $95, but its on sale for 80, but then $10 in taxes, but it turns out its in usd, why would they convert it to local currency like steam? No idea, ended up spending $130+ Canadian Dollars. Like damn.

Still its $85usd on US Amazon, no price yet on Amazon Canada, and doesn't come with digital (digital is $50usd by itself).

I think they are also pricing in the DM screen (usually $20), like they did with Spelljammer. Still a lot, though.

 

[Maxperson]

Except the contract with Ed Greenwood says they can't do that, its why they went from Jeremy's nothing is canon to Perkin's everything its own canon.

WotC has some talented people, but damn do they need better leadership.

Then replace Elminster with Mordenkainen or some other well established thing. How about Sigil? A mass hallucination across the planes!

 

[mamba]

How much I wonder will the 2024 core slipcase cost?

I guess about $200, going by the current one’s $170 MSRP and the $10 price increase per book

 

[mamba]

It did. Something doesn't have to happen in a single post for such an exchange to exist

yeah, it kinda does though, because if I add replies to one post to a different one, then I can make any reply that made sense in context look silly. Just like you did here.

My reply with you wanting an answer was before you even posted what you added it under, so it obviously was not in reply to that or even taking it into consideration.

 

[Henadic Theologian]

I guess about $200, going by the current one’s $170 MSRP and the $10 price increase per book

Is that in a American dollars?

 

[Maxperson]

yeah, it kinda does though, because if I add replies to one post to a different one, then I can make any reply that made sense in context look silly. Just like you did here.

My reply with you wanting an answer was before you even posted what you added it under, so it obviously was not in reply to that or even taking it into consideration.

This was a post of mine in response to you. Post #310 which occurred before BOTH of those posts you are talking about.

"Having canon hasn't stopped that in the past. Getting rid of canon now doesn't suddenly allow it. In the past we got "This is the way this event happened" which is canon, and we also got, "No one really knows how this happened, here are 5 things people think about it" which means there is no canon on that event."

Saying later "...not sure why everything needs an answer for you" was something you need to be incorrect about me, so that's why it got a facepalm.

 

[mamba]

Is that in a American dollars?

yes, looked up the MSRP on Amazon.com (where it costs about half that now…)

 

[mamba]

This was a post of mine in response to you. Post #310 which occurred before BOTH of those posts you are talking about

but I did not read it before my reply, because it is the latter of those two posts and I replied after reading the first one. This is not a conversation in real time, so just because you had written more by the time I replied does not mean I was aware of it yet at the time of my reply.

This really is not a difficult concept, my reply was in response to what I quoted. That you wrote something else that got a different reply from me does in no way mean that you can just add the first reply to the second quote as well… that is taking it out of context. If I had intended to write something similar there, I would have done so

 

[Maxperson]

but I did not read it before my reply, because it is the latter of those two posts and I replied after reading the first one. This is not a conversation in real time, so just because you had written more by the time I replied does not mean I was aware of it yet at the time of my reply.

The two posts you responded to were #312 and #314. How am I supposed to know that somehow you didn't read post #310 first and instead skipped it for some reason and went to the later posts and responded to those first?

This really is not a difficult concept, my reply was in response to what I quoted. That you wrote something else that got a different reply from me does in no way mean that you can just add the first reply to the second quote as well… that is taking it out of context. If I had intended to write something similar there, I would have done so

Yes. Numerical order is not a difficult concept. I reply to you in post #310, you read it. Then you read posts #312 and #314 and respond in such a way that you contradict what I said in post #310(a direct reply to you) by saying "... not sure why everything needs an answer for you".

I did not take it out of context, because the context of both posts #310 and #312 is "How canon works." A response to one of those posts is a response to both, unless for some inexplicable reason you just completely skipped post #310.

 

[mamba]

Yes. Numerical order is not a difficult concept. I reply to you in post #310, you read it. Then you read posts #312 and #314 and respond in such a way that you contradict what I said in post #310

I replied to 312 and 314, in order.

310 was pretty unrelated to this as far as I am concerned, it certainly does not say anything close to the ‘quote’ you were using (“You can have hard established canon or they can put out multiple possible interpretations for something as part of canon like they've done before.").
That is a rephrasing of 314 to me, not of 310, and that is what my replies since reflected… here is 310, check for yourself

40 years of D&D and there hasn't been an edition yet where I haven't been able to alter or ignore canon.

Having canon hasn't stopped that in the past. Getting rid of canon now doesn't suddenly allow it. In the past we got "This is the way this event happened" which is canon, and we also got, "No one really knows how this happened, here are 5 things people think about it" which means there is no canon on that event.

in either case, my reply to 312 was for that, my reply for 314 was for that, don’t add the 312 one there.
If somehow 310 is supposed to tell me the same thing as 314, then ok, I missed that. We are in agreement wrt 314, as my reply to that showed