UngeheuerLich
Legend
Actually, that would not make a difference for 99% of PCs...If WotC was consistent, they'd require a minimum 13 to qualify for the class, not just multiclass. That idea would likely be very unpopular.
Actually, that would not make a difference for 99% of PCs...If WotC was consistent, they'd require a minimum 13 to qualify for the class, not just multiclass. That idea would likely be very unpopular.
And they were right to do so.It's why PF2 has the nickname, Featfinder."Let's see how many feats we can cram into a class."
I'm not convinced this is the case.given that one receives more than a feat in class features...etc for dipping into another's class.
And they were right to do so.
Feats were the best innovation of 3e and it's a shame how WotC did their good child.
That’s incredibly unbalanced with other feats and with CR ratings and with any character who doesn’t take these feats. Basically, that’s extremely unbalanced and would require a total rewrite of the game. It’s not a serious idea for 1e.4th level feat: Class initiate
+1 ASI
you gain all 1st level benefits of a multiclass of the class of choice as in PHB. You do not gain any HP or HD.
8th level feat: Class adept, requires class initiate
+1 ASI
you gain 2nd and 3rd level class features of the chosen class. Do not gain any HP or HD from those levels.
12th level feat: Class expert, requires class initiate and adept
+1 ASI
you gain 4th and 5th level feature of the chosen class. Do not gain any HP or HD from those level. Do not gain 4th level ASI from that class
16th level feat: Class master, requires class initiate, adept and expert
+1 ASI
you gain 6th, 7th and 8th level class features of the chosen class. Do not gain any HP or HD from those level. Do not gain 8th level ASI from that class
19th level feat: Class paragon
+1 ASI
you gain 9th, 10th and 11th level class features of the chosen class. Do not gain any HP or HD from those level.
If epic destiny or what ever makes a return at 20th level
then you can gain all class features of 12th, 13th and 14th class levels, even the ASIs instead of that boon if you have all 5 feats before.
Because a wizard is an intelligence-based caster and should require an investment that a typical paladin PC (high in strength and charisma) wouldn't have.A Paladin can take a level of sorcerer or bard with no issues. But a level of wizard is going to cost him 5 point buy because.... ?
This so much, especially when 5e channeled that spite into creating so many new problems & limitations for everyone but the guy who strolls up to my table for the first ttrpg game ever without a couple minutes from me or another player helping them through chargen.And they were right to do so.
Feats were the best innovation of 3e and it's a shame how WotC did their good child.
I mean, yea. But I don't think removing ability scores is going to fly.Which brings up the question of why classes are hard coded to certain stats at all. All it does is get int he way and cause MAD.