Anyone who thinks Heathcliff is a romantic hero (as opposed to a Romantic protagonist) hasn't read the book.
Wikipedia isn't good for everything, but I think here their definitions of
romantic heroes and
byronic heroes are pretty spot-on to what a lit-professor would say. They are heroes in the same way that Greek Heroes are heroes, rather than the modern conception of the term -- people of great importance, but not necessarily anyone you might want to emulate. In other words, yes Heathcliff is a romantic protagonist who does not display modern heroic qualities, but that's part and parcel of what a romantic hero traditionally is.
Since y'all are on about tramatizing entertainment for kids, whats up with the 1986 Transformer movie? Like 80% of the cartoon autobots die in the first 5 min lol. Up until then they always fired at one another but never hit anything.
What do you mean by what's up with it? It was a marketing decision to remove all the discontinued toys from the toyline from the fictional narrative and shifting focus to the current year's new batch of product. It was also a misstep that damaged the brand (so you found it cheap/dirty pool/upsetting, know that it probably was an actual mistake). That being said,
this video argues that, in retrospect, it is an interesting story about what happens when the parental figures (minus a crotchety grandpa-figure) are taken out of a story and a bunch of inexperienced characters in archetypal young-people's roles have to rise to the occasion and save the day.
However, in the next animated film, G.I. Joe, they simply took the main players off stage while the noobs took over. I do get a laugh from the opening sequence "Don Johnson as Falcon, Sgt. Slaughter as Sgt. Slaughter..."
The '
G.I. Joe Movie' was never released in theaters because of the backlash to the Transformer movie. Instead it was direct-to-video and shown (broken up) as regular episodes. It had an almost-identical scene where Duke (the team-dad and Optimus Prime analog) takes a wound meant for a new
productcharacter. He was originally meant to die, but after the Transformers backlash they axed the funeral scene and added one line (said by an off-screen character, no less) saying that he was going to pull through.
Die Hard is a sh itty movie.
I wouldn't go that far, but (IMO) it is just another silly action popcorn flick that happened to have some fairly good performances by Willis and Rickman (at arguably each performer's peak). Throw Steven Seagal or even
Die Hard 2's Willis into the same plot, put them up against an equally boring villain (maybe
Cliffhanger-era John Lithgow's villain persona) and the movie becomes generic forgettable fare.