Charlaquin
Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Wow, these rules are the hottest of garbage and I will be house ruling them immediately and with extreme prejudice.
Its a common misconception that D&D has rules for things other than combat.Now, the believability problems arise when you apply the same rules outside of combat, and that's not what WotC is here for, why aren't you in combat.
50 years you mean.Lol. 10 years of community feedback and they still can't get Stealth right.
IMO you shouldn't be using stealth IN combat, but that's an artifact of them turning the thief into a Cuisinart.Treating stealth as a static DC invisibility does work well enough for using it in combat. Now, the believability problems arise when you apply the same rules outside of combat, and that's not what WotC is here for, why aren't you in combat.
No, because onednd is not a thingDoes this eliminate Passive Perception? Are passive checks even a thing in onednd?
I agree, but they long ago decided that Cunning Action means spamming Hide behind the same tree repeatedly... so this, I feel, is a reaction to that (making low-level Stealth-spam unreliable, but now allowing sneaky people to actually move around sneakily, or for melee Rogues to actually approach someone from behind).IMO you shouldn't be using stealth IN combat, but that's an artifact of them turning the thief into a Cuisinart.
I'd have a problem with this part. It's the player's action, they should be the ones rolling.3. Go invisible, sneak up to guard.
4. Guard rolls perception vs stealth roll.