D&D (2024) Greyhawk- New Map, Discussion of Changes

I don’t like “Oerthian” as the adjectival… If it’s pronounced like “Earth” said with a Brooklyn accent, shouldn’t it be “Oerthly”?
Maybe the planet name relates to "earthy", opposite "skyey"?

Judging by vowels in the term 'poem' and 'poet' from Greek via Latin, and by the various renderings of Norse œ, ø, etcetera, the English speakers would probably pronounce the digraph "oe" as American /oʊ/ or British /əʊ/.

If so, Oerth rhymes with "foe worth" /oʊʷəɹθ/.

Possibly, judging by "phoenix", Oerth could rhyme with "fee earth".

Probably, I will go with "foe worth".
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Maybe the planet name relates to "earthy", opposite "skyey"?

Judging by vowels in the term 'poem' and 'poet' from Greek via Latin, and by the various renderings of Norse œ, ø, etcetera, the English speakers would probably pronounce the digraph "oe" as American /oʊ/ or British /əʊ/.

If so, Oerth rhymes with "foe worth" /oʊʷəɹθ/.

Possibly, judging by "phoenix", Oerth could rhyme with "fee earth".

Probably, I will go with "foe worth".
No, it is pronounced like Bugs Bunny, per Gygax.
 




So were the seven or so adventures with locations added to the map originally part of Greyhawk? e.g. The Temple of Elemental Evil.

Just curiosity as some names are familiar.
Yes, all of Gygax's AD&D modules were set in Greyhawk (albeit...lightly), and the 1983 box set has a canonical location for all AD&D models published up to that time (which match their locations of the 7 major Dungeons on this new map).

I am really curious as to why they included the seven they did, and why not others.
 

Yes, all of Gygax's AD&D modules were set in Greyhawk (albeit...lightly), and the 1983 box set has a canonical location for all AD&D models published up to that time (which match their locations of the 7 major Dungeons on this new map).

I am really curious as to why they included the seven they did, and why not others.
1e-style is more like defacto "homebrewing" a unique setting, by the fact of running each adventure in isolation, and then realizing the constellations between them.

The 1e world more often "appears" in hindsight, with retcons, rather than planning it ahead of time.

The idea that other DMs would want to play in Gygaxs world surprised him.
 

Yes, all of Gygax's AD&D modules were set in Greyhawk (albeit...lightly), and the 1983 box set has a canonical location for all AD&D models published up to that time (which match their locations of the 7 major Dungeons on this new map).

I am really curious as to why they included the seven they did, and why not others.
Wasn’t Keep on the Borderlands written to be setting agnostic and later retconned into Grayhawk?
 

Wasn’t Keep on the Borderlands written to be setting agnostic and later retconned into Grayhawk?
Well, Keep on the Borderlands was a BD&D module...and not to get too into the weeds about TSR's absurd brand management in the era of excess, AD&D material was by default set in Greyhawk prior to 1984 (when Dragonlance dropped), and BD&D material was not set in Greyhawk. The not-Greyhawk of BD&D evolved into Mystara over time, so it is not incorrect to say that B2 is set in Mystara by default (because it follows Basic assumptions instead of AD&D assumptions), even though it was published before the Kent State graduates put their home campaign into B/X.
 

Wasn’t Keep on the Borderlands written to be setting agnostic and later retconned into Grayhawk?
Sorta, yes. It originally was setting agnostic. At least one printing of KotB offers a suggestion of placement in Greyhawk. But seeing, that the module was released for the "Basic" line, it was later retconned into the Known World (Mystara) with the release of the Expert Set.

So, really, it's wherever you want to put it.
 

Remove ads

Top