D&D (2024) Rules Clarification: Fighting Style Feats

[FrogReaver]

Fighting initiate looks like a decent Origin feat, so we can have damage option for origin feats instead of Savage attacker.

All making that an origin feat would do is give non-fighters-rangers-paladins, the toys of paladins/fighters/rangers. I'm not a fan of that.

 

[Kobold Stew]

All making that an origin feat would do is give non-fighters-rangers-paladins, the toys of paladins/fighters/rangers. I'm not a fan of that.

...like what happened to Rogues in 2014?

 

[FrogReaver]

...like what happened to Rogues in 2014?

I view that differently.

 

[Horwath]

All making that an origin feat would do is give non-fighters-rangers-paladins, the toys of paladins/fighters/rangers. I'm not a fan of that.

just like magic initiate then?

 

[EzekielRaiden]

just like magic initiate then?

Casters already have the most toys. Giving up one, small, niche toy to non-spellcasters is nothing.

 

[ECMO3]

I would like to see Fighting Styles be origin Feats. I really dislike that you need to multiclass to get a Fighting Style on a Warlock, Bard or Wizard (or Barbarian or Monk for that matter).

I also think the old Martial Adept should be an Origin Feat.

 

[Horwath]

I would like to see Fighting Styles be origin Feats. I really dislike that you need to multiclass to get a Fighting Style on a Warlock, Bard or Wizard (or Barbarian or Monk for that matter).

yes

I also think the old Martial Adept should be an Origin Feat.

yes, but doubled in value.

1 dice is beyond pathetic for a feat, even origin.