Sigh.Interestingly this came up first in my google search. I was actually attempting to read up in what context is it offensive because I have seen Asian restaurants with that word in their name. Anyways.
I mean, technically we're all Barbarians. Well, maybe except for the Classics majors...Yeah, we're just gonna re-litigate every word that ever came up as potentially offensive, aren't we.
No I didn’t say it was insincere. I stated earlier I think people taking contrary positions to mine are sincere and that they get passionate because these are moral issues people think matter. I mentioned it was fashionable at that time because I think that is what helped give it more traction and because narratives like that one tended to get accepted more readily at the timeSo you're suggesting that it is insincere? What's your evidence?
So, some folks think these issues matter, but they don't? Because you don't think they matter? Or, rather than sincerity, it's fashionable to be more inclusive?No I didn’t say it was insincere. I stated earlier I think people taking contrary positions to mine are sincere and that they get passionate because these are moral issues people think matter. I mentioned it was fashionable at that time because I think that is what helped give it more traction and because narratives like that one tended to get accepted more readily at the time
Well, kinda. It's more occidental vs oriental . . . but practically, amounts to the same thing. Othering the non-Western world as "exotic".A further issue with Oriental adventures is that it positions adventures in . . . Christendom? . . . as the norm; and adventures in other places as exotic and in need of calling out as distinctive or "special".
Take away that presupposition, and what we have is simply Adventures!
You are completely misreading what I saidSo, some folks think these issues matter, but they don't? Because you don't think they matter? Or, rather than sincerity, it's fashionable to be more inclusive?
You're probably right about that.You realize that almost every word that is considered inappropriate, rude, problematic, or offensive started out with "no pejorative meaning", right?
Yet, I feel that censoring words is not always the solution to fight a real problem. Oftentimes I wonder if it doesn't turn out to be more hurtful in the end; a form of radicalization of sorts. The issues behind "orcs", "phylactery" and "oriental" are all very different but all come down to a form of censorship with either little explanation provided, or one that is disconnected from the reality of people living out of certain regions of the US. This is getting uncomfortably political so I'm going to bow out of this thread, but feel free to send me a PM if you wish to engage further.Words gain pejorative (or problematic) meaning over time as one group uses them against another.
Like "oriental", for example.
The PHB isn't called "Occidental" adventures, though.Well, kinda. It's more occidental vs oriental . . . but practically, amounts to the same thing. Othering the non-Western world as "exotic".