I was just reminded of something about naming versions while sorting and tagging books in my Kindle. If you’re following any current/recent fiction series where novels are flanked by interstitial novellas and short stories, it’s become very common for them to get decimal numbers.
One novella between two novels will be X.5. Three short stories might be X.3, X.6, and X.9, or X.1, X.2, and X.3. A novella and a short story will be X.5 and X.75. And so on. I see this across the spread of sf and fantasy; I don’t read Western, romance, military, and other genres where series with such mixes of length are common, so I couldn’t say about them. (This isn’t a sneer. I do read some in a bunch of genres, but when I do, it’s almost always singletons.)
A lot of us gamer types are also reader types. So it’s a source of influence alongside the memory of D&D 3.5.
One novella between two novels will be X.5. Three short stories might be X.3, X.6, and X.9, or X.1, X.2, and X.3. A novella and a short story will be X.5 and X.75. And so on. I see this across the spread of sf and fantasy; I don’t read Western, romance, military, and other genres where series with such mixes of length are common, so I couldn’t say about them. (This isn’t a sneer. I do read some in a bunch of genres, but when I do, it’s almost always singletons.)
A lot of us gamer types are also reader types. So it’s a source of influence alongside the memory of D&D 3.5.