Recent content by Dursk Starkfire

This is not true of skill checks, only of attack and saving throws.

Camarath, I believe everybody is in agreement that invisibility ends after the first attack, irregardless of whether it is contained within a full-round attack. I think what is being questioned is whether the defender remains flat-footed from being attacked by an invisible opponent. I guess...

restoration The spell restoration also eliminates fatigue and exhaustion, so in theory, if you had a cleric willing to spend the 100gp in diamond dust and the 4th level spell slot every day, he would never have to sleep. Also, clerics are not penalized for spells for not sleeping. They only...

Would that mean that all the BBEG would have to do is redecorate or move his furniture around to change the 'layout'? Sounds like we'll end up with a lot more fung-shui conscious BBEG's... :rolleyes:

yes. Magic Vestment Transmutation Level: Clr 3, Strength 3, War 3 Components: V, S, DF Casting Time: 1 standard action Range: Touch Target: Armor or shield touched Duration: 1 hour/level Saving Throw: Will negates (harmless, object) Spell Resistance: Yes (harmless, object) You imbue a suit of...

Some examples of spells that would work: Bless (Range 30ft), Alter Self (Personal) Spells that wouldn't work: Animal Growth (Range 100ft + 10ft/lvl), Animal Messenger (Close (25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels)), Animate Dead (Touch) HTH, Dursk

No, touch spells are not allowable with the Persistent Spell feat. Only spells that have a range of Personal, or have a fixed range (30ft line). I'd even argue that spells with ranges that increase with caster level are not allowed with this feat. From Tome and Blood: Persistent Spell...

What are you talking about? He's a monk. Monks threaten while unarmed. No TWF or Ambidexterity required. It's all under "Improved Unarmed Strike". Improved Unarmed Strike: Benefit: You are considered to be armed even when unarmed - that is, armed opponents do not get attacks of opportunity...

I believe the reason behind enforcing the order of attacks, as Darklone pointed out, is to mitigate people abusing True Strike to muscle their lowest attack. Full attack is always carried out from highest through lowest BAB to ensure that certain bonuses do not become unbalancing. To extrapolate...

Problem #2 perfectly illustrates why this was such a terrible ruling by the sage. I assume that this will be immediately rectified in the 3.7 edition of the players handbook.

unless you were a deepwood sniper and threatened with your bow... and if you were an Order of the Bow Initiate, you could draw your bow in melee without provoking AoO's.

That list is for Greyhawk, found anything for the Realms?

So, clerics who subscribe to the travel domain get "freedom of movement" as per the spell for x rounds per cleric level... From the SRD: Granted Powers: For a total time per day of 1 round per cleric level you possess, you can act normally regardless of magical effects that impede movement as...

sorry, this is listed in the Deities & Demigods 3.5 supplement for the Community domain (which also had status as a 4th level domain spell). I figure same rules would apply to Fate domain... http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dnd/20030718a STATUS, GREATER Divination Level: Community 4...

how about Greater Status, which allows you to cast cantrips, 1st, or 2nd level spells that have a range of 'touch' through the status, so long as they are on the same plane...