Search results

I don't know. I just realized that everything in my post had three items. I'm sure there's a Rule of Three somewhere in the world :D Ah, here we go.

Here's how it works. 1. Ranger gets bit. At end of encounter, roll a Saving Throw. If you fail, you contract the disease. The immediate effect is losing one healing surge. 2. After an extended rest, make an Endurance check. If you make the Improve check, you're healed. If you make the...

Due to the errata, conjurations do not occupy a square unless stated. So you could indeed end in the same square as most conjurations.

Under Charge... No Further Actions. Blah blah, can't do anything unless you use an action point.

Ditto. I'll probably buy them if they offer compiled PDFs for relatively cheap. If they don't sell compiled version, or they're too expensive... forget paying for them.

It's the only currently planned adventure. They might make more at some point. Who knows? There might be some 3PP that starts putting out Setting-specific adventures.

Gouge out the eyes? Really, the best bet (next to eye gouging) is blindfolding.

Not game breaking, but certainly empowering. Give a rogue the ability to SA with a Greataxe... that's a leap from d4 to d12. Start throwing in multiples, you're talking about an average increase of 4 damage per multiple. For one feat...

I don't see anything preventing it.

Take away everything except the basic attack, and possibly one special quality/ability. Damage is average of original monster. Reduce hp to 1. That seems to get it close enough.

Decide what they're good at. Give it a value 5-8 higher than untrained skill checks. Or just give it whatever you want. That's pretty much it. :D

It was supposed to be out on The Day, but it's Wizards... did you really expect them to keep it? :D It's also not like a week will change much. The greenlight for 3rd party products is still several months away.

From what I hear, most of the TPKs come from old 3.5 players not realizing a shift in tactics is necessary.

Currently no, but I expect something like it will appear in the Martial Splat coming out.

Chris Perkins playtested a lot of versions of D&D. He probably has some troubles keeping the rules straight. I know I would.

But what constitutes a bad rule? Who are we to say the system is or is not valid? (Said light-heartedly) For me, anything after level 21 is not considered broken or wrong, no matter how powerful. When a creature can zap you to 0hp in one attack, you can heal all you want between battles...

I like keeping track of my spellbook. When I'm in for the long haul, I actually get little notepads with the appropriate number of pages and write down all my spells. Just a neat little thing to so. Make Whole: I think you're underestimating how poor peasant types usually are. To fix a...

When talking about quick glances and room descriptions, I use passive/secret checks. When the players do something actively, they roll.

"This answer is no longer available" .... heh. I saw them for a second.

If not, there might be a good substitution. Assuming (big thing here) that they implemented changing a mini's color, you could just use different colors for each condition. But having prone/bloodied figures would be really nice.