I don't see a link for the Wizard video yet. Anybody?
I don't see a link for the Wizard video yet. Anybody?
It is interesting insofar as Crawford said they weren't going with a version exactly like any of the UA versions, but were taking the results of each feature and creating a new mix. So, we'll see how that turns out...Ranger next, hey? Kind of an important one to get right, IMO.
Ranger and bard are the only two where the last UA is not indicative of the final version.It is interesting insofar as Crawford said they weren't going with a version exactly like any of the UA versions, but were taking the results of each feature and creating a new mix. So, we'll see how that turns out...
Blame 4e for that...Ranger is the only video whose smarminess I'm going to suffer all the way through. It's going to be so goddamn funny/disappointing when they go 'we think Ranger's identity is, the thing they are about is... uh, maybe they... uhh... Hunter's Mark!'
Much as 4e's Ranger wasn't that interesting, its Quarry mechanic was actually still miles ahead of Hunter's Mark, simply because it was applied to the nearest target, which automatically encouraged them to move around to get a more optimal target.Blame 4e for that...
I think you're over-prioritizing Wisdom - avoid things with DCs and it doesn't come up that much. Other than that, yeah, Resilient Con seems extremely solid, except for lagging behind warriors who picked GWM or similar fighting style feat.For a STR ranger, probably the best choice is starting 16,12,13,8,14 and just take resilient con as soon as possible.