D&D 5E A brief rant about Rime of the Frost Maiden, farming, logistics, and ecology

Eltab

Lord of the Hidden Layer
I've only skimmed through the adventure on Dndbeyond. Is it explained why there is a group of Chultans in IWD? Just wondering why a group thought to themselves "ya know, I like it here in this tropical paradise, but where I really want to live is a frozen wasteland..."
IIRC - and I may not - they left during an era of upheaval in Chult, and apparently just kept going north until they found someplace relatively quiet. The Frostmaiden text is not specific, but the time frame might work out to The Spellplague (which turned Chult from a peninsula into an island) or when Ubtao ceased responding to the Chultans.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Well, no, not literally in a couple of senses. Firstly, had winter actually persisted from 1 winter season through spring, summer, fall, and then the next winter, that's not two years, although it would be more than one, so literally not two years.

Secondly, the "Year without Summer" wasn't a yearlong (or 1 1/4 year long) winter, it was a year that had a late spring, a much cooler than average summer, and an early fall and winter season. This caused many crops to fail and massive famine and disruption even though a total crop failure did not occur. Had there been literally a year-long (or 1 and 1/4 year long) winter, the devastation and death would have been near extinction level for most of the Northern Hemisphere. So, not literally winter for even one year, much less two.

Well the basic premise also includes some light during the day, just not bright sunshine. It has not been pitch black for the past two years. In any case, it's a couple of lines and not something I would judge an entire mod on.

It's actually very few light. 20 hours of pitch black, 4 hours of twilight, in non-blizzard conditions, for "more than two years". No region of Earth can be compared to such a situation for inspiration of what would happen before taking magic into account. The severity of the consequences should also be envisioned by comparing to the earlier "normal" conditions. The average temperature is said to be -45°C during this period. That's mid-Antarctica level, but it also fell upon an area where the average climate is much warmer. I envisioned Icewind Dale as Scandinavia, where summer can be quite hot. The forgotten realms wiki gives a normal average temperature range was -10 to +21°C in summer, -40°C being described as the low point of the "unforgiving winter". Basically, their yearly average became lower than their usual coldest winter month.

The "Year without summer" mentionned upthread was a temperature anomaly of around 3°C at worst, while we are speaking of a 50°C summer temperature anomaly. The two phenomena have very little in common, as Ovinomancer pointed out, not only in length but also in scope. It was just a rainy, cloudy summer.
1816_summer.png


While it's just a couple of line, it's exactly for this reason it's easy to correct (maybe an Alexandrian take on this module will include some of them). The most obvious is two shorten the time. RPG often have an odd description of time length, with cities having tens of millenia of history, something I never understood (a gap of a few years is enough for a gaming group to insert adventure in a timeline...) so the easiest fix is to make winter two month late, not two years... It would explain the lack of social change (and lack of mass emigration or even notice of the fact that the situaiton that should probably be widely known to be localized in the Dale since there are many spellcasters in the area and their first instinct when seeing that the day/night pattern is disturbed should be "wtf..." then casting a Sending to inquire if it is the same in Luskan... after 2 month, maybe the information didn't circulate enough). But it would make the human sacrifice very quick to appear. It's not something that could be easily corrected as well. Make sacrifice to Auril a regular occurrence during harsh winters, with sacrifice of food being common, ritual sacrifice of warmth being performed sometimes, cattle sacrifice to be ordered in case of emergency and human sacrifice to be a known occurence in the past but something not practiced for decades...) In that case the ten town just agreed, when realizing, through the illumination problem, that it's not a normal winter, to turn a blind eye to the town who would want to reinstate it. It would explain why such an extreme solution was devised in a rather short timeframe, explain why the people are doing it despite the sacrifice not bringing any visible improvement to the town doing them (they just hope it will stop the unnatural phenomenon, and it's too early to tell). AFAIK, nothing breaks if there isn't a long string of sacrifices but just a handful of them.

With regard to the mood of the population, I wonder what would be the effect. At some point, as other have already pointed out, we get the feeling that it's "business as usual". In Bryn Shander, the local goodwill and sense of humor is dampened by the reduction of the number of visitors and the lack of trade income it brings... Their sense of humor should be dampened by their inevitable death by famine which should have wiped most of their population already instead. And I am not sure a community that turned to sacrificing its own members to survive would be high on the list of places where goodwill toward strangers is a staple. I mean, visitors would be IDEAL sacrifice candidates, unless they are heavily armed PCs... Business as usual is more credible if it's only a delayed spring, not an endless winter (but I can see an endless winter being more dramatic... but I don't think people would "get used to the idea of their impeding starvation"? It's not just like living in Alaska, where you know that you'll survive even if there is a bad winter... it's like being in your house in the middle of the forest fire, hoping the rain will stop the flames before they reach your house, from which there is no safe escape route). As a side note, given Bryn Shander's population of 1,200 and the map in the game which has a walled area of roughly 65 ha, the city's density is fairly low - I was surprised by the large number of housing on that map). It's very easy to depict starvation and insert the story of an exodus attempt that failed ("several families tried to leave by boat, but it capsized when an iceberg rose under it, none survived... that's when we decided to resort to sacrifices like our grand-grand-grandfathers did").

Using magic as a way of sustaining people is also an explanation that works well, of course, but it has limits over a two year period. First, by RAW, the statistics of 1 spellcaster in 100 spellcaster explicitely refer to Monster Manual druid, priest and mage, not the adventuring classes. So, they can't cast useful spells like Goodberries and Create food and water. This is however a very restrictive reading of the situation and not something players should notice as a deal breaker. Even if, usually, they don't get these spells, given Auril's active intervention, it's not a stretch to imagine Amaunator would grant Create Food and Water to its priests. But such a behaviour would certainly turn people toward him more than toward Auril... On the other hand, it's possible to make a plot point out of it to increase the feeling of desesperation. Yes, the winter was terribly harsh and we usually just have enough food to manage, but this year the last harvest was already very poor so we tasked our spellcasters to find a solution... Unfortunately, they can't do it reliably and in the long term. First, doubling the production of crop is bound to fail as nothing grows without light, so doubling 0 is still 0. Goodberries and Create Food and Water are a possibilty for the 12 spellcasters in Bryn Shander, who can pool their resources to feed the population: 30 people for each priest and 70 people for each druid. Assuming an even distribution of spellcasters, that's 330 person that can be fed out of magic in Bryn Shander. It's not enough (and they couldn't have stockiled it as the food created by both spells magically wastes away after a day) to sustain the city... and also, it's mobilizing their entire spellcasting capacity. So, for example, they have the need to arbitrate between producing food and provide healing in case of injuries (which must be a common occurrence when hunting ferocious beasts and fishing with the risk of being immerged in glacial waters). That would bolster the horror feeling of the story. Of course, spellcasting PCs would... either start mass casting food-producing spells for money (you can make a killing in that case, though it won't make you popular) or, if they are even remotely good... will they really memorize adventuring spells when they know that casting of Bestow Curse at an opponent during a fight will mean they will deprive 15 Bryn Shander's childrens of food for the day?

The problem is also in the uneven distribution of spellcasters. What if the only person in a 100 inhabitants hamlet is a worshipper of Auril or an evil god, or simply uninterested in helping (and just saying "no can do" while sustaining only himself)? Tension could be added to the situations in some settlements.

Magical food wouldn't explain the abundance of predators encountered. If it's not really credible they would survive after more than two years, as the grazers would have disappeared already, they are more of a menace if the timeline is shortened. They ate most weakened preys already (and paradoxically, a very bad autumn and an harsher winter would have weakened most grazers, enough for the predators to enjoy easy to catch preys, until they wiped them all, and now, they are turning increasingly closer to civilization. Especially as the town are doing sacrifice of food by letting it in the open to feed creature Auril is fond of... Increased menace of predator is good in the atmosphere the adventure is trying to convey. Especially as magical healing is lacking as the local druid is producing goodberries en masse so encounter with a pack of wolves while hunting one of the few remaining wild moose could prove fatal.

It's not that Rime is a bad adventure, it's just that some design choices were made that deprives from the horror mood instead of reinforcing it. Nothing unsurmontable but still. I'll probably wait for an Alexandrian version of it if he gives Rime the same treatment he did for DiA.
 

FitzTheRuke

Legend
Ha, true! There is a bit of danger in their home. Exploration might be the best answer though. I think exploration and opportunity could be a reason to move from a home they've adapted to, having even domesticated dinosaurs to a degree, to a frigid location in the north. I saw a Chultan was a chieftain and I was all what? But that was all I read at the time.
Yeah I saw that and thought it was great! Chultan explorers! Nice to see the non-Euro-inspired humans voyaging the world!
 


MGibster

Legend
If you approach it, as @Umbran is, as an "adventure" module, then, well, minor details are not terribly interesting. It's not what the adventure is about and anyone else who approaches it in this manner probably won't even question it. OTOH, if you are more in the @Chaosmancer camp, where these sorts of modules are meant to be world building exercises, then, sure, it's very important.

Now, to me, it's abundantly clear that WotC isn't terribly interested in the world building exercise. It's not what sells adventures. But, it does really highlight the different approaches to the game.

My world building philosophy for role playing games is to build it around making it fun to play an adventure in. I honestly don't worry too much about how the economy, politics, or anything else works beyond just making sure we can have a fun game in it.
 

FitzTheRuke

Legend
I may have been defending the adventure, but I'm probably one of those people that likes my fantasy worlds (and my D&D) to be relatively 'realistic' - I do a lot of historical research; I don't like silly/farcical things much; I prefer to tone-down magic; etc.

I've just always found that 'holes' in an adventure are places for me to flex my creativity. Some are better than others. I found Rime to be an adventure that made me say "Yes! And..." more often than it made me say "No, not that!" The "Too Much Winter" thing was, to me, very easy to 'fix' and didn't distract from the absolute plethora of interesting ideas in Rime.
 

Coroc

Hero
The tendency to confuse personal taste with quality is nearly universal.

It's not "stupid" to have an armada of priests. If the demographics are correct that were posted above, you could keep a population from starving to death for a LONG time. Remember, you don't need a goodberry every day to not die. A single Goodberry 1/3 days, with potable water, would keep you from starving to death for months or even years. A full day's worth of calories every 3 days? Yeah, that's going to suck a lot, but, you stay alive a REALLY long time like that. Which effectively means that a single Goodberry spell keeps 30 people from starving indefinitely (presuming it's cast every day).

No one is saying that the people in these towns are happy. They certainly aren't. And the situation is going from bad to worse, so, it's not tenable in the long term. But, two years isn't actually that long. Famines lasting much longer than that have failed to wipe out entire populations. Granted, these famines killed LOTS of people and it would take centuries for the populations to recover, but, again, it's entirely plausible.
sure, if iwd happen to be in eberron it could stay shock frozen for a century without probs, but that's not exactly survival horror to be resolved by the pcs, don't ya think?v
 

MarkB

Legend
sure, if iwd happen to be in eberron it could stay shock frozen for a century without probs, but that's not exactly survival horror to be resolved by the pcs, don't ya think?v
It's not either-or, though. It's not "without magic two years is untenable, but with magic two centuries is a doddle." There's a whole continuum between those extremes.
 


Chaosmancer

Legend
I may have been defending the adventure, but I'm probably one of those people that likes my fantasy worlds (and my D&D) to be relatively 'realistic' - I do a lot of historical research; I don't like silly/farcical things much; I prefer to tone-down magic; etc.

I've just always found that 'holes' in an adventure are places for me to flex my creativity. Some are better than others. I found Rime to be an adventure that made me say "Yes! And..." more often than it made me say "No, not that!" The "Too Much Winter" thing was, to me, very easy to 'fix' and didn't distract from the absolute plethora of interesting ideas in Rime.

I don't disagree with any of that.

My position has been more that

A) there are holes
B) they were not filled by the deisgners
C) filling those holes can make the adventure more interesting.

I've said it a few times now, I don't want to make a value judgement on the adventure or the creators, just acknowledge that it would have been a better adventure as written if they had given us some interesting answers to these questions.


It's not either-or, though. It's not "without magic two years is untenable, but with magic two centuries is a doddle." There's a whole continuum between those extremes.

But, can we point to why if you can solve it with magic for year 1 that magic can't keep doing that for a very extended period of time?

I mean, spells restore daily, so they are as reliable as human muscle power. If there is something we can do for a week, through sheer muscle power, it is likely we could do it for a very extended period of time (barring working ourselves to exhaustion, which is not something you seem to be able to do with magic)
 

Remove ads

Top