Nifft
Penguin Herder
paradox42 said:Apologies in advance if all this extra detail makes the post too long.
No, no! This was excellent. Thank you!

-- N
paradox42 said:Apologies in advance if all this extra detail makes the post too long.
Mishihari Lord said:Star Control 2, right?
Actually, I have no problems with the idea of adding a 10th alignment - Amoral. But, in the absence of that, it doesn't matter what the creature thinks it is, it only matters what it does.
...
It doesn't matter that the Far Realms being doesn't understand its actions (which we can't determine either way since their motives are by definition unknowable), all that matters is that when an intelligent Far Realms creature meets a non-FR creature, it ends badly.
Land Outcast said:If understanding doesn't matter here, Why is intelligence a factor?
Maybe I'm wrong here, but I understand that the reason why creatures of Int 3+ have alignaments is because they can understand their actions.
The Normal Tiger doesn't understand how killing the Normal Human is Evil.
Therefore he isn't evil.
Yes, I'm equating intelligence with understanding.
[sblock=Note on the far Realm, Good, and Evil]
The Seven Heavens offer you this: roll d20 -> 20
The Nine Hells offer you this: roll d20 -> 1
The Far realm has this[/sblock]
srd said:Evil" implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient.
srd said:Animals and other creatures incapable of moral action are neutral rather than good or evil. Even deadly vipers and tigers that eat people are neutral because they lack the capacity for morally right or wrong behavior.
Tequila Sunrise said:When I DM all monsters have alignments. Period. This is Dungeons & Dragons, not Far Realms and Philosophies.
Yep, that's fair.Tequila Sunrise said:When I DM all monsters have alignments. Period. This is Dungeons & Dragons, not Far Realms and Philosophies.