Scholar & Brutalman
First Post
Rechan said:I'd much prefer something that is distinctly non-demi-human. Goblin, kobold, animal-person. Goliath or some other Larger-than-Human would be interesting.
Minotaurs would fit that description nicely.
Rechan said:I'd much prefer something that is distinctly non-demi-human. Goblin, kobold, animal-person. Goliath or some other Larger-than-Human would be interesting.
JVisgaitis said:Drow aren't a race, their a subrace.
If we add them into the mix we have elves, eladrin, high elves, and drow. Way too many elves even for a treehugger like me.
Although they are very classic "Monsters we put to the sword".Scholar & Brutalman said:Minotaurs would fit that description nicely.
Minotaurs would be sweet; but I'm a Dragonlance fan.Scholar & Brutalman said:Minotaurs would fit that description nicely.
Not nearly as much as orcs would.Rechan said:Although they are very classic "Monsters we put to the sword".
I also fear that it would get too many "D&D is becoming WoW" responses.
What about lizardfolk?
Half-Elves are essentially Diet Elf, so that makes four.Mourn said:Not anymore. The 4e changes to races seems to make drow, elf, and eladrin all completely separate races that are distantly related to eachother (cousins, in the sense that dwarves and gnomes have been called cousins in the past).
Actually, there's only three: eladrin (sun elves, high elves, gray elves), elves (wood elves, wild elves), and drow. And only one of them seems to care about being treehuggers, like yourself.
I'd prefer a dragon-man type race, personally. Just so long as it's not those damn Bat-people that WotC seems to love for some reason!el-remmen said:What about lizardfolk?