Vasthulthus's sheet is full of errors.Your stat breakdown doesn't appear to include Dexterity or Constitution adjustments due to Virtual Size.
VSCs don't adjust dex or con. That's for actual size categories only.
Vasthulthus's sheet is full of errors.Your stat breakdown doesn't appear to include Dexterity or Constitution adjustments due to Virtual Size.
Belzamus said:Going in reverse from the rest of your post -- he's Huge, not Gargantuan, would that not reduce the armor's strength requirement to 130?
And the Ark I would assume is worth a simple +24 ECL since it's basically a Divine Bonus in all but name.
Oh, and the +36 thing was calculated in a completely different way using the "How to build your own divinity template" section wear U_K states that a +2 to all scores is +1 ECL, and you can trade then at 2:1. So, a +3 to all scores should also be +1 ECL, therefore a +36 to three scores is +12 ECL, yes?
Out of curiosity, are Alabaster's six swords really appropriate for his ECL? I know he's 30 or so higher than V, but those are some crazy weapons, and just their base enchantments put many of them higher than V.'s weapons by quite a bit.
You know... you're completely right.
In the interest of me not having to do more work, though, I'm going to offer one final argument.
Given the huge ECL range the tournament is open to, even if we applied a level adjustment for the places where he exceeds his allowed abilities, he would still fall in under 239, are we agreed on that?
Personally, I never liked going past 100, maybe 150ish for practical play. This territory we're in here is a nightmare to balance, if it's even possible at all. I might even offer that it's *less* balanced in this bracket than it is at the 300+ range, but... I really don't feel like getting into that.![]()
My main reservation is having to type out and format a separate Attack and Full Attack section.![]()

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.