fusangite said:
Wow! This thread reminds me of just how much unbalancing crap has been published for D&D.
It's not the "unbalancing crap". I also don't think 3.0 was broke. Players choose to break the game. Besides, "stunting" a 50+ AC at 6th lvl is neat-o, mathamatically, but if a player chooses to do this, the DM can just hit him with everything but straight attacks. A character this dedicated would be hard pressed in my game; but then all the PC's are. There is nothing a PC can do, in my opinion, that can unbalance a game, if the DM chooses. If the other PC's are somehow not having as much fun because (they see) another player dealing out more "whoop-up", well, the NPC's see this too...
Anyway, I think that it shows a great deal of enjoyment for the game to dutifully study the myriad books and supplements to construct these "optimized builds". However. the OP seems to be dismissing the enjoyment inherent in fulfilling the point of a discussion forum.
Allow me to metagame:
DM: The slavering maw of the Budonka-donk roars agape, assaulting your nose eyes and throat with the fell stench of death; bursting forth with unholy speed, the Budonka-donk attempts to bite, thick bilous sours line the creatures lips... What's your AC?
PC w/AC50+ @6th lvl: My AC is 63.
DM: Show me.
But, that's just my game.