• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

AI is stealing writers’ words and jobs…

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn’t make it do anything. I gave it a prompt. That it then chose to break copyright law based on its programming isn’t on me. I had no way to predetermine what output it would give me.
What prompt was used? Was it a generic prompt like "Give me this thing in a D&D style description" or was it more along the line of "Give this me this race using 5th edition player hand book style"
 

log in or register to remove this ad

What prompt was used? Was it a generic prompt like "Give me this thing in a D&D style description" or was it more along the line of "Give this me this race using 5th edition player hand book style"
Combo of those. ‘Give me this thing in 5e d&d style’
 


I didn’t make it do anything. I gave it a prompt. That it then chose to break copyright law based on its programming isn’t on me. I had no way to predetermine what output it would give me.
Did you know that copyright concerns are an issue currently being fought by creatives but chose to use it anyway knowing it's possible copyright could be broken? If so then it seems like it's, at least in part, "on you".
 


Which model did you use? I just checked on chatgpt asking it for the gnome description from the 5th edition PHB and the stats, which it put up. But I have no idea if that's allowed due to the SRD or not lol.
I think it was perplexity ai.

If it was from SRD it would have needed the SRD OGL disclaimers at the time, else it’s still copyright infringement.
 





Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top