• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

All Aboard the Invisible Railroad!

What if I told you it was possible to lock your players on a tight railroad, but make them think every decision they made mattered?

What if I told you it was possible to lock your players on a tight railroad, but make them think every decision they made mattered?

away-1020200_960_720.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

While this may sound like the evil GM speaking, I have my reasons. Firstly, not every GM has time to craft a massive campaign. There are also plenty of GMs who are daunted at the prospect of having to figure out every eventuality. So, this advice is offered to help people scale down the pressure of being a GM and give them options to reuse and recycle their ideas and channel players through an exciting adventure that just doesn’t have as many options as they thought it did. All I’m suggesting here is a way to make sure every choice the players make takes them to an awesome encounter, which is surly no bad thing.

A Caveat​

I should add that used too often this system can have the opposite effect. The important thing here is not to take away their feeling of agency. If players realise nothing they do changes the story, then the adventure will quickly lose its allure. But as long as they don’t realise what is happening they will think every choice matters and the story is entirely in their hands. However, I should add that some players are used to being led around by the nose, or even prefer it, so as long as no one points out the “emperor has no clothes” everyone will have a great game.

You See Three Doors…​

This is the most basic use of the invisible railroad: you offer a choice and whichever choice they pick it is the same result. Now, this only works if they don’t get to check out the other doors. So this sort of choice needs to only allow one option and no take backs. This might be that the players know certain death is behind the other two doors ("Phew, thank gods we picked the correct one there!"). The other option is for a monotone voice to announce “the choice has been made” and for the other doors to lock or disappear.

If you use this too often the players will start to realise what is going on. To a degree you are limiting their agency by making them unable to backtrack. So only lock out the other options if it looks likely they will check them out. If they never go and check then you don’t need to stop them doing so.

The Ten Room Dungeon​

This variant on the idea above works with any dungeon, although it might also apply to a village or any place with separate encounters. Essentially, you create ten encounters/rooms and whichever door the player character’s open leads to the next one on your list. You can create as complex a dungeon map as you like, and the player characters can try any door in any order. But whatever door they open after room four will always lead to room five.

In this way the players will think there is a whole complex they may have missed, and if they backtrack you always have a new room ready for them, it’s just the next one on the list. The downside is that all the rooms will need to fit to roughly the same dimensions if someone is mapping. But if no one is keeping track you can just go crazy.

Now, this may go against the noble art of dungeon design, but it does offer less wastage. There are also some GMs who create dungeons that force you to try every room, which is basically just visible railroading. This way the players can pick any door and still visit every encounter.

This idea also works for any area the player characters are wandering about randomly. You might populate a whole village with only ten NPCs because unless the characters are looking for someone specific that will just find the next one of your preset NPCs regardless of which door they knock on.

What Path Do You Take in the Wilderness?​

When you take away doors and corridors it might seem more complex, but actually it makes the invisible railroad a lot easier. The player characters can pick any direction (although they may still pick a physical path). However, it is unlikely they will cross into another environmental region even after a day’s walk. So as long as your encounters are not specific to a forest or mountain they should all suit “the next encounter.”

So, whichever direction the players decide to go, however strange and off the beaten path, they will encounter the same monster or ruins as if they went in any other direction. Essentially a wilderness is automatically a ‘ten room dungeon’ just with fewer walls.

As with any encounter you can keep things generic and add an environmentally appropriate skin depending on where you find it. So it might be forest trolls or mountain trolls depending on where they are found, but either way its trolls. When it comes to traps and ruins it’s even easier as pretty much anything can be built anywhere and either become iced up or overgrown depending on the environment.

Before You Leave the Village…​

Sometimes the easiest choice is no choice at all. If the player characters have done all they need to do in “the village” (or whatever area they are in) they will have to move on to the next one. So while they might procrastinate, explore, do some shopping, you know which major plot beat they are going to follow next. Anything they do beforehand will just be a side encounter you can probably improvise or draw from your backstock of generic ones. You need not spend too long on these as even the players know these are not important. The next piece of the “proper adventure” is whenever they leave the village so they won’t expect anything beyond short and sweet. In fact, the less detailed the encounters the more the GM will be assumed to be intimating it is time to move on.

Following the Clues​

Finally we come to the most common invisible railroad that isn’t ever considered railroading (ironically). Investigative adventures usually live and breathe by allowing the player characters to uncover clues that lead to other clues. Such adventures are actually openly railroading as each clue leads to another on a proscribed path. The players aren’t forced to follow the clues, but what else are they going to do? The players are making a point of following the railroad in the knowledge it will take them to the denouement of the adventure. What makes this type of railroading entertaining is that the players feel clever for having found the clues that lead them along the path. So if they start to divert too much the GM can put another clue on their path or let them find the next one a little easier and you are back on track.

The "Good" Kind of Railroading​

Now, all this may all seem a little manipulative, but modifying events in reaction to what the players do is a part of many GM’s tools. Any trick you use is usually okay as long as you do it to serve the story and the player’s enjoyment.

That said, never take away player agency so you can ensure the story plays out the way you want it to. This sort of railroading should only be used just to make the game more manageable and free up the GM to concentrate on running a good game instead of desperately trying to create contingencies. So, remember that you must never restrict the choices and agency of the players, at least knowingly. But it is fine to make sure every road goes where you want it to, as long as that is to somewhere amazing.

Your Turn: How do you use railroading in your games?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Andrew Peregrine

Andrew Peregrine

All player choice is illusion, as it is always up to the roll of a die or the DM the results of those choices.


Seen that, too.

Here's another:

The DM has the adventure prepared. The players can choose to go to city A or city B. Regardless of which they choose, the adventure hook will take place and set the PCs on their path to the adventure.

This is a classic example of the pick a door scenario. It happens all the time, even if the DM's doing it don't realize it.

Or another:

The DM has the adventure prepared, but the players get sidetracked. Later on, the DM still runs the adventure after the sidetrack is over, even though the "timeline" of the world might indicate other events made the adventure null.

I could go on and on.
how can you NOT relize you are doing it? like YOU KNOW there are not multi seeds and hooks and spread through the cities... YOU KNOW they are all the same...
 

log in or register to remove this ad

pukunui

Legend
I like not knowing as much as possible. I set up situations rather than plots and then just let the players loose. Between player shenanigans and swingy dice, I get to be as surprised as them.
I mostly only run published adventures, so while I’d prefer to only set up situations and scenarios, generally there is a bit of plot. So I like to inject a bit of randomness where I can so that even I can be a bit surprised sometimes.

This is one of the reasons I’m enjoying running Dungeon of the Mad Mage. There is no plot, and I’ve removed the level restrictions on the magic gates, so the players are in complete control of where they go and what they do.
 

Maxperson

Morkus from Orkus
This is one of the reasons I’m enjoying running Dungeon of the Mad Mage. There is no plot, and I’ve removed the level restrictions on the magic gates, so the players are in complete control of where they go and what they do.
I've been running it also, kinda sorta. I know my players aren't going to be into doing that much Undermountain all at once, but they do like dungeons. What I've done is stripped each level out as an individual dungeon and removed all mention of Halaster. The players are currently seeking out a book that they need to deal with one of the plots going on in the world, and they found out that it's in a castle underground. Insert a dungeon in a mountain that is levels 6 and 7. During the session last night they finally found the tunnel down to the seventh level and are trying to negotiate with the stone giants.
 

pukunui

Legend
I've been running it also, kinda sorta. I know my players aren't going to be into doing that much Undermountain all at once, but they do like dungeons. What I've done is stripped each level out as an individual dungeon and removed all mention of Halaster. The players are currently seeking out a book that they need to deal with one of the plots going on in the world, and they found out that it's in a castle underground. Insert a dungeon in a mountain that is levels 6 and 7. During the session last night they finally found the tunnel down to the seventh level and are trying to negotiate with the stone giants.
I’ve just been running it as is as much as possible. I tried the whole “multiplanar game show” conceit from the DMs Guild Companion but it just didn’t stick (mostly because I kept forgetting about it). After the first party wiped to the drow on level 3, I had the second party “hired” by Halaster to do the “clean house” quest (ostensibly to prepare the dungeon for the next season) with the promise of a wish each if they make it down to his lair on level 23.

I think the pandemic kind of wreaked havoc on a number of the more plotted campaigns I tried to run (like Odyssey of the Dragonlords), so we’re all enjoying the simplicity of an old school dungeon crawl with no real plot. The guys don’t really have to remember stuff that happened months ago in real time. They can just kick in the door, kill the monsters, and take their stuff. Although sometimes they talk and negotiate with the monsters instead.

All that being said, I have told them that we’ll stop if/when we all get bored of it. I‘m not going to try and force them to grind all the way through. But several of them are keen to get to level 20, and this remains the only published adventure in which you can actually do that, so we may stick with it for a while yet.

(Next session is tomorrow. They’ve finished exploring level 6 and are about to start figuring out how to open all the portals and figure out where they all go. I’ve been using XP and somehow they’ve hit 10th level already, so they’re a bit ahead of the curve.)
 

Reynard

Legend
Supporter
By that logic, there is never railroading. If you (or others) feel that way, no wonder people can claim "I've never railroaded my players!".
I don't understand. The definition of "railroad" presented is "it happens because the GM decides it does, regardless of the actions of the PCs" not "as a consequence of those action." By your logic, literally EVERYTHING is railroading.
 

Reynard

Legend
Supporter
Immersion is for the most part universally superior to the alternatives. It means you're so caught up in things that it steals your focus. Being "caught up in the moment" ... being "into it" ... being "blown away" ... how often do people reference these things as bad things?
No, that's engagement. They aren't the same thing.
 

Reynard

Legend
Supporter
Part of the art of DMing is knowing when to offer real choice versus the illusion of choice.

Two plot hooks that lead to the same place: illusion of choice.
Two paths than offer different hazards that can be negotiated separately: choice.

There's a place for both. What I think DM's should try to avoid is when the rails are visible: not even the illusion of choice.
And people are telling you that illusion of choice is not good. If there is no choice, just present it honestly. Most players won't care if it happens on occasion. Telling your players they have options when they don't is a breach of trust. Uour job as GM is not to entertain the players or tell them a story. It's to facilitate fun at the table where everyone has input into the outcome.
 

overgeeked

B/X Known World
And people are telling you that illusion of choice is not good. If there is no choice, just present it honestly. Most players won't care if it happens on occasion. Telling your players they have options when they don't is a breach of trust. Your job as GM is not to entertain the players or tell them a story. It's to facilitate fun at the table where everyone has input into the outcome.
It’s really wild how “be open and honest with your players” is such a tough sell. Do these referees really think they have to control everything for the game to work? Lighten up the grip. It’ll be okay.

Referees don’t have to lie to their players to run a successful game. You can actually play to find out what happens instead of pretending you are and lying to the players about it and their choices. If railroading is so awesome, why the need to lie to the players about it happening? It’s such a weirdly and pointlessly adversarial thing to do. The players can have fun without you controlling literally everything. The reason you have players at the table is to get their input, i.e. play off their choices. If they don’t get to make choices there’s no reason to have players.
 
Last edited:

pemerton

Legend
consider this scenario:

The PCs are captured and ordered to complete a task. If they don't agree to do it, they will be executed. They are under a Zone of Truth and have failed their saves, so cannot lie.

Is that railroading?
If I knew nothing more than what you say here, I would think this is pretty railroad-y. There might be contexts where it's a consequence for failure that reflects chosen stakes, and is not a railroad.
 

pemerton

Legend
um... you cut the part of my answer were I explained that I currently have a world that is locked from the planes... if they pushed trying I would let them find away...
Because that part makes no difference to the question. Your "world" is just story that you've written. You've written a story in which the players can't have their PCs succeed at a thing that they want their PCs to achieve. As I asked, how is this not "railroading (or similar)? It's the GM deciding that the action declaration will fail in advance of play and regardless of how the players frame their attempt.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top