der_kluge
Adventurer
A bit of background. We started a new campaign with a new DM (who was a player in the first campaign) and I decided to try a Bard. My first character was a gnome cleric/illusionist and I initially played him for role-playing purposes, but I min-maxed him pretty well and he was really quite powerful.
That aside, my new character is a 17-yr old female human bard named Annelise. The DM used "Central Casting" to work up a history for the character (we tossed out rolls that made no sense, and generally took the best of two rolls on every branch of the history-making process). My initial idea was of just a bard, and I had no real rigid idea in place for the character. The history was such that the character ended up being kind of a con-artist type of character. She lied frequently, yet was very trustworthy. Her dad was a snake-oil salesman who pretended to be a cleric. It ended up being quite cool, and I really liked the concept. As a character, she's actually quite difficult to role-play, and I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the most amazing role-player ever. But I digress once again. But, I like her, and I am enjoying playing her.
At first, I really struggled with the Bard class when making the character. I even posted on here and shared thoughts about how I thought the class made no sense to me. A lot of it had to do with the fact that my character had a lot of depth and personality and she didn't fit within the rigid confines of the Bard class. I decided I had no basis for my argument, and chose to just go with the Bard class AS-IS and go from there.
Fast forward. We just made 3rd level this weekend, and I've decided that my character is, perhaps, the most worthless I have ever played. Part of it has to do with my pathetic ability scores. 8 strength, 13 dex, 10 wisdom, 12 constitution. She does have a 16 int, and an 18 charisma. So, in a social setting, she just rocks since she has tremendous bluff, diplomacy, and gather information ranks. In combat, I might as well be a wallflower. Bards are not amazing in combat anyway, and with my 8 str, I rarely hit, and if I do, it's for 1d6-1 points of damage (with a short sword). At first level, I could sing inspire courage once per day, and then twice at second level. And, at second level, the ONLY 1st level spell I knew - charm person, I could cast once per day. This last game, I cast it on an orc, and it failed.
But again, it goes back to the class. I can handle the lack of good combat ability, but I'm struggling with the lack of combat AND the lack of spellcasting ability. Since, really, the Bard has neither, IMO. And, if you've got neither of those, then what good are you, really?
And the musical ability of the Bard is a joke, (again, IMO), especially when it doesn't really fit the personality of the character. It's like I told my friend - she's not exactly the kind of character who walks into battle singing "Glory, Glory, Hallelujah!" It just doesn't fit her personality.
So, I sent a note to the DM asking if I can change her. I want to keep the personality and ability scores in tact, but make her a Rog1 (which makes sense given her past) and then advance her as a wizard from there. She has the intelligenc for it, and she has a higher level wizard's spellbook, so it's conceivable that she could have learned some things from it.
Actually, a rog1/sor... makes more sense, but I'm the only arcane caster in the group, so from a diversity standpoint, a wizard would be more useful. That is, being able to actually cast identify rather than paying someone else to do it would be very handy. That, and I tend to think Sorcerers are weak, too. But that's another argument. And if I were a sorcerer, I'd definitely NOT take identify as one of my spells.
I haven't gotten a response back from my DM yet, but I wanted to ask (and you've surely got an opinion having reading this far) - Am I a powergamer?
Or, where is the fine line between being a powergamer (or a min/maxer which I see as more or less the same thing) versus wanting to actually be a useful asset to the party?
Other pertinent info, our group consists of :
half-orc fighter
human cleric
human rogue
elf fighter
Thanks for any opinions you might have.
edit: fixed some things
That aside, my new character is a 17-yr old female human bard named Annelise. The DM used "Central Casting" to work up a history for the character (we tossed out rolls that made no sense, and generally took the best of two rolls on every branch of the history-making process). My initial idea was of just a bard, and I had no real rigid idea in place for the character. The history was such that the character ended up being kind of a con-artist type of character. She lied frequently, yet was very trustworthy. Her dad was a snake-oil salesman who pretended to be a cleric. It ended up being quite cool, and I really liked the concept. As a character, she's actually quite difficult to role-play, and I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the most amazing role-player ever. But I digress once again. But, I like her, and I am enjoying playing her.
At first, I really struggled with the Bard class when making the character. I even posted on here and shared thoughts about how I thought the class made no sense to me. A lot of it had to do with the fact that my character had a lot of depth and personality and she didn't fit within the rigid confines of the Bard class. I decided I had no basis for my argument, and chose to just go with the Bard class AS-IS and go from there.
Fast forward. We just made 3rd level this weekend, and I've decided that my character is, perhaps, the most worthless I have ever played. Part of it has to do with my pathetic ability scores. 8 strength, 13 dex, 10 wisdom, 12 constitution. She does have a 16 int, and an 18 charisma. So, in a social setting, she just rocks since she has tremendous bluff, diplomacy, and gather information ranks. In combat, I might as well be a wallflower. Bards are not amazing in combat anyway, and with my 8 str, I rarely hit, and if I do, it's for 1d6-1 points of damage (with a short sword). At first level, I could sing inspire courage once per day, and then twice at second level. And, at second level, the ONLY 1st level spell I knew - charm person, I could cast once per day. This last game, I cast it on an orc, and it failed.
But again, it goes back to the class. I can handle the lack of good combat ability, but I'm struggling with the lack of combat AND the lack of spellcasting ability. Since, really, the Bard has neither, IMO. And, if you've got neither of those, then what good are you, really?
And the musical ability of the Bard is a joke, (again, IMO), especially when it doesn't really fit the personality of the character. It's like I told my friend - she's not exactly the kind of character who walks into battle singing "Glory, Glory, Hallelujah!" It just doesn't fit her personality.
So, I sent a note to the DM asking if I can change her. I want to keep the personality and ability scores in tact, but make her a Rog1 (which makes sense given her past) and then advance her as a wizard from there. She has the intelligenc for it, and she has a higher level wizard's spellbook, so it's conceivable that she could have learned some things from it.
Actually, a rog1/sor... makes more sense, but I'm the only arcane caster in the group, so from a diversity standpoint, a wizard would be more useful. That is, being able to actually cast identify rather than paying someone else to do it would be very handy. That, and I tend to think Sorcerers are weak, too. But that's another argument. And if I were a sorcerer, I'd definitely NOT take identify as one of my spells.
I haven't gotten a response back from my DM yet, but I wanted to ask (and you've surely got an opinion having reading this far) - Am I a powergamer?
Or, where is the fine line between being a powergamer (or a min/maxer which I see as more or less the same thing) versus wanting to actually be a useful asset to the party?
Other pertinent info, our group consists of :
half-orc fighter
human cleric
human rogue
elf fighter
Thanks for any opinions you might have.
edit: fixed some things
Last edited: