Hi guys 'n' girls. I've been lurking for awhile now and have finally been tempted to post. Why? I've seen a number of references by various people that claim that clerical archers (in 3.5 ed) are remarkably powerful.
Having been 'forced' (by bending my rubbery arms...) into taking Clerical levels with my (now character level 3) elven Warblade (with low str and con that was being massacred on the front line) to take Cleric levels due to a lack of well...actual Clerics in the party (not helping with the massacring) - I don't see it.
Racial proficiency with bow: good, but not intended.
Chosen domains: War & Travel (fits background of character). Good, but not really related to archery.
Spell selection: I don't get it. Most clerical spells (at low levels at least) relate to minor buffing. Higher level spells seem pointless as a bow might as well be shooting a door for all the effect it will have then.
Feat selection: Not currently related to archery, but if feats counted so much a fighter would be better.
So...can someone please enlighten me as to what makes a Cleric archer so (apparently) good?
Having been 'forced' (by bending my rubbery arms...) into taking Clerical levels with my (now character level 3) elven Warblade (with low str and con that was being massacred on the front line) to take Cleric levels due to a lack of well...actual Clerics in the party (not helping with the massacring) - I don't see it.
Racial proficiency with bow: good, but not intended.
Chosen domains: War & Travel (fits background of character). Good, but not really related to archery.
Spell selection: I don't get it. Most clerical spells (at low levels at least) relate to minor buffing. Higher level spells seem pointless as a bow might as well be shooting a door for all the effect it will have then.
Feat selection: Not currently related to archery, but if feats counted so much a fighter would be better.
So...can someone please enlighten me as to what makes a Cleric archer so (apparently) good?