dcollins
Explorer
I've had a recurring problem with how Giants have a vast overabundance of Hit Dice and hit points, compared to other creatures of the same size. They very much break the guidelines for monster design set down by Skip Williams in his article on the subject. (See here: www.superdan.net/dndmisc/monster_abnormal_hd.html )
But having poked the numbers recently, I think the Giant Challengge Ratings may be, similarly, too low for their abilities and Hit Dice (similar to too-low Dragon CRs). Running it through a computer simulator, they generally rank about the same power level as an NPC fighter of their CR + 4.
Example: Stone Giant, AC 25, hp 119, Atk greatclub +17/+12 (2d6+12), etc. He matches up most closely with a 12th-level NPC Fighter (per 3.0 DMG): AC 25, hp 94, Atk bastard sword +19/+14/+9 (1d10+8). The giant has the same AC, more hit points, similar attacks with better damage, plus reach. That would seem to indicate the giant should be CR 12, not the listed CR 8.
Any other experiences on this? Do other folks have a history of running Giants against PCs and the PCs having a significantly harder time than you expected according to CRs?
But having poked the numbers recently, I think the Giant Challengge Ratings may be, similarly, too low for their abilities and Hit Dice (similar to too-low Dragon CRs). Running it through a computer simulator, they generally rank about the same power level as an NPC fighter of their CR + 4.
Example: Stone Giant, AC 25, hp 119, Atk greatclub +17/+12 (2d6+12), etc. He matches up most closely with a 12th-level NPC Fighter (per 3.0 DMG): AC 25, hp 94, Atk bastard sword +19/+14/+9 (1d10+8). The giant has the same AC, more hit points, similar attacks with better damage, plus reach. That would seem to indicate the giant should be CR 12, not the listed CR 8.
Any other experiences on this? Do other folks have a history of running Giants against PCs and the PCs having a significantly harder time than you expected according to CRs?