Raven Crowking
First Post
"2e" is not a Trademark, is it?
No, but in the linked post on DF there is explicit mention of AD&D. I'm actually unclear if the limitation extends beyond the document itself, but I see that, for example, the authors of OSRIC are very careful about that."2e" is not a Trademark, is it?
D&D (with the ampersand) is explicitly trademarked therefor it's safe to assume AD&D is. While writing my retro-clone, I expressly avoid the mention of anything that directly refers to the old game going so far as to call the product I'm basing it off of "Zeb Cook's 2nd Edition Ruleset" and the original D&D "The Original Fantasy Game." I even changed THAC0 because, while I'm not certain the term is trademarked, it is possible under the trademark rules (it's a unique term) and I've never seen THAC0 used outside of 2nd Edition. Even other retro-clones and publications, including HackMaster which I would expect to have it, don't use it.
As for 2E, I'm pretty sure they don't as it's a pretty common phrasing. 3E isn't trademark and neither is "3rd Edition" or even "4th Edition."
4E makes a lot of inherent assumptions about player strength and has an extremely dense system of options. This makes for a very fun game. But the same richness makes tweaking it into a "grim and gitty" rules system complicated unless there is a simple trick that is easy to balance.
I do know that C&C is successful enough to support 2 full time employees, but that is still far less than the success of Mongoose or Paizo. As for Kenzer, I do not know, but I do get the impression that no one has quit their day jobs, but I have not seen anything specifically stated by them.
Retro-Clones of the Lost Caverns would be better.You must admit, Retro Clones would be a pretty good name for a band.