I voted "yes," though technically I'm not running or playing 5e at present, because if I were running 5e, I would be gearing up to switch to some other system as a result of this action, so long as my players were okay with that change. (I would not force such a change on my players unless I literally had no other choice, e.g. if I somehow lost all access in any form to the rules needed for play.)
And if I were playing, I would at least have a chat with my DM to ask if they would consider running some other system instead; if not, well, I'd probably still stick around until that game ran out, but I wouldn't join up with any new 5e games and I would generally hope for (and work toward) a natural conclusion for the existing campaign. Note the "natural"--I don't mean "bum-rush an ending no matter what so long as it has a fig-leaf excuse." I mean genuinely seeking a real and satisfying conclusion (ideally, satisfying for all participants) sooner rather than later, as opposed to purely letting things meander through their own course.
Edit: That said, since I own the 4e books and have access to various resources on that front, I might run a 4e game. Wouldn't run any other edition. It's the one WotC hates anyway, so I see it as biting my thumb at them.