D&D (2024) Asians Represent: "Has WotC Fixed the D&D Monk?"


log in or register to remove this ad

Complain about it in the surveys? Absolutely. Complain about it here on EN World? An entire confluence of situations all have to fall completely right for anyone who can actually do something with the complaint take it and possibly see it get used.
so about even with the survey then ;)

my personal opinion is that no one should actually believe any posts they make here will have a tangible effect on what gets published in 5E24.
I don’t think anyone believes that
 


Third party publishers do not in any way factor all in my D&D games. I do not purchase those books nor do I allow players to use them at my table.
Further, it's the job of 3pp to add to games, not fill in deficiencies in the system. The lack of psionics in 5e is a deficiency that WotC should address, not a 3pp. The 3pp should add to WotC's system by making new disciplines or subclasses, or a modification to the system. If WotC is relying on 3pp to fill deficiencies in their design, that's a failure on their part.
 



And I feel for you. For me it's board games-- I haven't been able to get Illuminati on the table for a full game in over 10 years at least cause nobody else gives a crap about it.
I feel your pain...

feelyourpain.jpg
 


Further, it's the job of 3pp to add to games, not fill in deficiencies in the system. The lack of psionics in 5e is a deficiency that WotC should address, not a 3pp. The 3pp should add to WotC's system by making new disciplines or subclasses, or a modification to the system. If WotC is relying on 3pp to fill deficiencies in their design, that's a failure on their part.
Maybe so, but it is what it is. Nothing we do is going to move the needle at WotC, so why bother?
 


Remove ads

Top