Autumn
First Post
EvolutionKB said:When are you going to start making choices for the group? Do you want character sheets yet or just rough ideas(manuvers chosen, feats ideas, and a larger background?)
I'll give it a couple more days before I make any definite decisions on players, so I'm not asking for character sheets yet. I don't want to put people to the trouble of a full character sheet while there's still a chance they won't get into the game. For now I'm happy to talk things through on a conceptual level.
Brian Compton said:OK. I can be persuaded- human cleric/warblade it is. I'm thinking that he's semi-fanatical, but that it's a front for doubts about the separation of pureblood humans from mixed-blood.
What domains would be appropriate for a cleric of Astres?
Cool, sounds like there'll be some very interesting dynamics there.

Astresian Clerics pick from the domains of Good, Law, Protection, War, Inquisition (Complete Divine), and Purification (Complete Divine).
Nac Mac Feegle said:Ooh, half-orc with a bonus feat, that could do me very nicely (and I totally agree with your sentiment, by the way. AAAAARGH sums it up about right). Who knows, if I get along in the levels I might take some racial paragon levels .
You want me to start working up a character sheet?
Glad that the half-orc idea suits you!
See my above comments in this post concerning character sheets - tl;dr version is that you should probably hold off for now. In the meantime though, something to think about concerning his background - what kind of tribe does he come from? Those tribes with totemic/shamanistic beliefs tend to be more 'primitive' and tied to their monstrous humanoid counterparts (which fits well with your race) compared to the druidic pagans. At the most savage end of the spectrum are the marauding orc tribes who often don't bother to cook their meat once they've caught it, while at the most civilised end are those human pagans who have settled into self-sufficient farming communities. Have a think about where your character will fall on that scale, and what he'll think of his neighbours on it.
Of course as far as the Astresians are concerned, 'pagans' is a nice blanket word with which to bundle up all the recalcitrants who prefer to live in the wilderness rather than embrace their destinies.

drothgery said:Did the 3.5 treatment of Genasi change from the FRCS version? They're not in the SRD, and if I've got a 3.5 book with them statted out, it's not obvious which one to me (I don't have the Planar Handbook or the Players Guide to FR which would have been obvious places to look).
I'm in the same boat as Zurai - as far as I know, FRCS has the most up-to-date stats for the genasi. Those are the ones I'm working with.
EvolutionKB said:I would like to go the unarmed variant of swordsage(lose the armor prof but gain monk unarmed strike damage). The other side would definately be fighter. He would focus on unarmed UFC type combat. His fighter feats would be mostly put to use to gain the various melee weapon mastery/bludgeoning type feats from PHBII. He would focus mainly on shadow hand, setting sun, and diamond mind manuvers.
That all sounds fine to me. Background looks good as well, in fact it has some rather interesting implications for plans I already had in place. I'm getting some ratbastardly ideas already.

One thing I wasn't clear on though - that last sentence makes it ambiguous, but are you intending that he will be still out for revenge on his father's killer as the game starts? If so then that works just fine.
* * *
A question for all my prospective players, something that was flagged up by Brian Compton's comments - do you feel a 32 pt buy is adequate? Or does the nature of the gestalt rules necessitate a higher point value?
I'm open to giving you guys more points to play around with, if it helps you to realise your concepts and feel better about your characters. Obviously it would mean a corresponding increase in your opponents' strength as well.