Breaking News: Kuo-Toa Not Froggy Anymore


log in or register to remove this ad


Aeolius said:
And it points out a great name for an undersea supplement:

Sea Below ;)
And I forgot to mention how great the old school art was before the "anime" came into D&D.
That scene of action is so... awe ispiring... I can't even hold my breath. :cool:
 

Most recent Monster Manual 5 Comparison
106303.jpg



To be honest I like the frog theme since I can fathom frogs being on land for extended periods of time.
 

Woas said:
To be honest I like the frog theme since I can fathom frogs being on land for extended periods of time.

fathom... heh heh ;)

Perhaps one could compare them to snakeheads:
250px-Northern_snakehead.jpg

"...snakeheads... are distinguished by a long dorsal fin, small head with large head scales on top, large mouth and teeth. They have a physiological need to breathe atmospheric air..." (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channidae )
 

FWIW, I always really liked the 3E kuo-toa.

For me it was an example of monstrous race that could be evil and creepy without having fangs, horns, random spikes, plated segments or glowing eyes.

Not that there aren't any examples of this elsewhere, just saying it struck me as a particularly good one.
 

JediSoth said:
Why does the tree-form Dryad have breasts? Or is that just a trick of the shadow?
Because it spends most of its time looking like a actual woman and when it assumes 'tree' form, it's mostly just a covering?

Because the Dryads still want to look female in tree form?

Because Dryads are traditionally female and the boobs automatically make us think of girls?

Because the artists had a thing for splinters?

Take your pick. :D
 




Remove ads

Top