Berandor said:
So, if I may be so bold, why don't you read and comment to your leisure without being a judge?
I plan on doing that
anyway!
It just so happened that the organizer thought he might need an extra judge on-hand for emergencies. The emergency judge became a real judge when the size of the contest expanded. It seems to me that keeping an emergency judge on-hand is still a good idea.
I didn't see anyone else offering, so I did.
I don't think you will find your way to judging this way.
I personally frown heavily on allowing anyone to judge who has not participated heavily. If you are not judging the only way to participate is by writing.
If you think judging takes significantly less time than writing you are sorely mistaken, and probably not ready to judge.
You are perfectly welcome to your opinion.
I do not appreciate the more personal aspersions you've decided to toss in, lacking any knowledge whatsoever of any qualifications I might possess.
When I write for fun, I take a *long* time. While I'm certain that speed writing contests could improve my skill (and I have participated in such in the past), they aren't as much fun for me as taking my own pace.
However, I currently work at a consulting firm, where I spend a lot of time as an editor of other people's work. I am often the "Go-to Guy" in the office when it is time to write something that gets submitted to the clients. I have been published - under the corporate name - in trade magazines.
In short, I'm not exactly a clueless newb when it comes to these things - and I thought "emergency judge" seemed like an excellent way to apply my own skills to a contest I otherwise would be unable to directly participate in.
So, for *me*, judging would most certainly take less time than writing for the contest - and, actually, I kinda sorry I volunteered.
That being said, I'll still kibosh when the actual participants post their tales.