Lord Zack
Explorer
Wormwood said:*shrug*
I don't see why.
If the 4e Devils are "tempters" and 4e Demons are "monsters", the succubus should be a Devil, right?
No, because I don't think that it should be that way.
Wormwood said:*shrug*
I don't see why.
If the 4e Devils are "tempters" and 4e Demons are "monsters", the succubus should be a Devil, right?
Patryn of Elvenshae said:Or, drop them altogether and create a new, actual Fury monster.
Whizbang Dustyboots said:More than declaring that D&D is dead to me because some monsters have changed, this is what I think is a cause for ... "concern" might be too strong, but maybe "cautious interest."
...
Mark Chance said:Perhaps. Or, perhaps, you should be more clear.![]()
Lord Zack said:No, because I don't think that it should be that way.
Much, much too late for that I'm afraid. So, given that this would appear to be the division we'll be seeing going forward, doesn't that suggestion make more sense?Lord Zack said:No, because I don't think that it should be that way.
You would be wrong. I loved Planescape.avin said:I'm under impression that most people on these boards just hate Planescape... 0.o
Nah, Planescape regularly comes up on polls as one of the most popular campaign settings. Personally, it's my favorite setting of all time. But these changes don't bother me. It'll be great fun adjusting the setting to compensate, and I can easily imagine the shock rolling through Sigil if the Blood War was called off...avin said:I'm under impression that most people on these boards just hate Planescape... 0.o
avin said:I'm under impression that most people on these boards just hate Planescape... 0.o