ChatGPT lies then gaslights reporter with fake transcript

[trappedslider]

This is actually surprising and I question the value of continuing.

A gun does what its meant to do.

An 'AI' makes up false information, and passes it off as correct.

These things are not the same, and I dont believe you are actually unaware of that.

If you hit a Sig P320 it will discharge, is it meant to discharge when you hit it? In that case you do indeed blame the maker.

 

[Dire Bare]

An interesting paper I saw this morning, regarding the use of ChatGPT in the classroom for students learning English as a second language and writing essays in English. They found that students who could use ChatGPT either supervised in class or whenever they wanted did better than those who were not allowed to use the technology.

But are they learning how to write, or how to copy from ChatGPT? Are they learning how to research effectively?

As a teacher . . . while generative AI may have it uses in the classroom, overall it is a bane to education and is contributing to the slide of American's knowledge and skill development. On some days, I see only dystopia in our future . . .

 

[Dire Bare]

Do you blame a gun or the person who uses the gun?

EDIT: With that example like AI, three things can be true all at once or individually : Someone using the tool incorrectly, someone using it in a manner it's not meant to be used or the company behind it screwed up big.

Yes.

Both to guns and the use of AI.

How folks use the tools is problematic. So are the tools themselves, their easy availability, and the lack of controls on their use.

 

[Deset Gled]

What an odd tangent.

Blame is not a limited resource.