Mustrum_Ridcully said:
I wonder how the new Terminator TV series is going and if that influenced the desision for the Terminator movies, and whether they will reference each other or stand on their own. (I suppose the latter, since the series and the 3rd movie seem to contradict each other...)
Now, see, for a series that is so firmly rooted in changing the past, I don't see a real contradiction.
In T3, it was after Sarah Connor had died of cancer.
Then, in the series, Summer Glau and the other terminator went back BEFORE those events and changed them -- that timeline was cut off and effectively no longer happened. It was referenced (the Tam-inator mentioned Sarah dying of cancer on the 'correct' date from T3), it just changed because they had altered the past.
So T3 is kind of an orphaned storyline, but not directly contradicted... it just no longer happened because the timeline changed. They already did this in the story once -- Judgement Day no longer happened on the date listed in T1, due to the Connors' actions in T2 to destroy Cyberdine. T3 (and the series) indicate that it still happens... but now the date has changed.
If you really want to bend your brain... try and figure out how events originally led to Connor sending his lieutentant back in time to be his own father, since the Terminator movies and series have shown an iterative timeline of small changes to the future based on changes in the past.
Now, we could start discussing how they're messing with their own rules in the series (the destroyed Terminator's head travelled in time with them, despite no organic cover, for one thing)... but that's another topic.
----------------------------------
I'm very happy with the casting of Bale, he's a great actor.