Contemporary Simulationist TTRPGs [+]

Well, those militaries have had people studying military conflict for decades. And those definitions probably don't actually map to when the last person got shot all the time, do they?

You figure Joe, who was a farmer last week and now is fighting off the goblin horde, has that kind of understanding? Or even anyone who isn't in a formal military organization?

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say here.

My point was that we can have things like "encounters" and "fights" that we talking about in discrete terms as a simulationist concept, where dbm was claiming that framework would be gamist or narrativist.

I assume that Joe could tell you he got in three fights last week: one at work, one at a bar, and one at the Molly Hatchet concert. Joe could identify when each one started: when he slapped his boss, when that dude broke his beer bottle and threatened him, and when he spit on the couple in the row in front of him. And Joe could tell you when they all ended: when he got thrown out, when security split them up, and when he got knocked out.

That framework of identifying what an encounter is, when it starts, and when it stops does not require specialized training. It can also be formalized in military theory for those that want a higher level of pedantry. But either way, it is a model in games that directly matches and simulates how people experience life. For certain lifestyles, of course. Military, Molly Hatchet, whatever you're into.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Is Shadowdark situationist? It's new. It's trying to make the matter of a torch and light important. It seems to attempt to simulate it with a variety of rules that seem to simulate real torch use... within reason.

What about Dune it's new? It uses abstract rules of Assets. But it has houses and positions, and armies and guns and espionage and secrets... and it seems to want to simulate all of the features, plots, and political ties of Dune and real politics in general. While the abstraction of Assets helps mechanics stay somewhat easy to digest, it has a LOT of different bespoke ways to utilize very specific concepts in simulating political strife and warfare. Heck, they went as far as to try and simulate the person shield and knife fights with rather overblown rules...
 

Yes it could.
You are missing my point. Your position was that encounter based duration was simulationist. My point is that there is nothing which a character can observe which defines an ‘encounter’ and so that only exists in either the context of the game (‘roll initiative’) or a scene. So such a rule is gamist or narrativist in nature.

Anyhow, we seem to have a difference of opinion.
 

the abstraction of Assets
First, no game is 100% any style of game, that was the main error of the Forge IMO - that they wanted games to be pretty much one thing only.

Abstraction is an interesting concept in game systems, and it starts to move away from simulation in my mind. Consider super powers as a genre.

When GURPS does supers, you work out the damage required to punch through tank armour based on its damage resistance and structural hit points, and this will tell you how much strength you would need which in turn tells you how much you should be able to lift. It also means that you would probably reduce a normal human to a fine red mist if you were to punch them. That’s a strongly simulationist approach, since the implication of being able to punch out a tanks is logically extrapolated to other applications of strength.

But supers aren’t actually very simulationist themselves, genre tropes tend to be much more important. If you look at strongly narrative supers systems their powers are much more abstract and map to more specific applications of those abilities in genre. So while the play experience is closer to what you might see in a comic or supers film it doesn’t necessarily map to what would happen ‘in reality’. But that’s ok - we aren’t playing in a worlds that is itself highly simulationist.

I don’t think the 2d20 system is strongly simulationist due to the meta currencies baked into the system; they are again a much more gamist or narrative concept.
 

Remove ads

Top