Shade
Monster Junkie
BOZ said:the 3.5 rod of cancellation doesn't seem to have any text regarding artifacts though.
Not directily, although it does account for the sphere of annihilation (which is an artifact).

BOZ said:the 3.5 rod of cancellation doesn't seem to have any text regarding artifacts though.
Shade said:Well, the disenchanter has no limit on its magic item wrecking ability. Of course, it is CR 17 so that might make a difference.![]()
Shade said:As for the suggestion, I like it as a targeted ability, rather than a true gaze attack. It could be a targeted gaze like the vampire's domination, though.
I still like it as a successful save grants reprieve for 24 hours, but the critter can use the ability as often as it wants.
BOZ said:exactly - which is why i think a limit to the number of times per day is necessary. that, or the cancellation is temporary.
BOZ said:oh, don't get me wrong, it will be a targeted ability. what i was thinking of doing was taking this: "If the victim is meeting the Flitte's gaze, he makes his saving throw at -2." and making something like this:
"Gaze that Weakens Your Willpower" (Su): Range 30 feet, Will DC X negates. As a free action, a flitte's gaze imposes a -2 morale penalty on Will saves for a single creature for one round.
good, bad, ugly? one way or another, the suggestion will otherwise have nothing to do with a gaze.
BOZ said:here's an idea. the spell works for 1 hour/level. let's say that if the save is successful, the creature will be unaffected for X hours with X=caster level for the ability. good compromise or no?
BOZ said:what i meant was, if we say make the caster level 7, then a creature that makes its save would be immune for 7 hours (we would state it that way).
hmm, how about changing the suggestion duration to 1 round/level instead? or, for it to make more sense, change it to simply say "works as a suggestion that lasts for X rounds"