Could you enhance/enchant a masterwork shirt like armor?

Hypersmurf said:
You don't need the CMA&A feat or the armor slot to craft Bracers of Armor.

I've got no problem with someone building Bracers of Armor into shirt form with the CWI feat, the Mage Armor spell, and a CL at least twice the bonus, with a 1.5x inaffinity cost.

Whether or not they're allowed to add armor special abilities would depend on whether the DM was using the Arms and Equipment Guide, with its otherwise nonexistent rule that Bracers can contain special abilities.

You're not making the shirt into magic armor with a +X enhancement bonus to a +0 armor bonus; you're making the shirt into a wondrous item that surrounds the wearer with an invisible but tangible field of force, granting him an armor bonus of +1 to +8, just as though he were wearing armor.

-Hyp.
I'd allow the robe that gave a field of force like the Bracers of Armour as a Wondrous Item (and no additional price for the slot because the robe slot can hold any effect without a penalty, as per its "various" slot affinity), but I wouldn't allow the A&EG rule to add on special abilities, at least unless they had the CMA&A feat. Also, I would allow "making the shirt into magic armor with a +X enhancement bonus to a +0 armor bonus" using CMA&A, as there is precedent for allowing a +X enhancement to a +0 bonus (Barkskin used on someone with no natural armour bonus of their own).
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Rystil Arden said:
... but I wouldn't allow the A&EG rule to add on special abilities, at least unless they had the CMA&A feat.

From memory, A&EG requires the feat for armor special abilities on Bracers as well.

-Hyp.
 

Hypersmurf said:
From memory, A&EG requires the feat for armor special abilities on Bracers as well.

-Hyp.
Heh, that's what I get for making a ruling without ever reading the rule. At least it shows I'm on the same page with whoever wrote that sidebar.
 



Hypersmurf said:
For the purpose of the spell, though.

If you consider normal clothing to be armor with no AC bonus under all circumstances, then you end up with naked monks.

"When wearing armor, using a shield, or carrying a medium or heavy load, a monk loses her AC bonus, as well as her fast movement and flurry of blows abilities."

-Hyp.

True. But if you consider the spell used in the enhancement process to be Magical Vestments instead of Mage Armor, just why couldn't someone make a shirt that granted an armor bonus even though the shirt/clothing itself grants no armor bonus nor is armor? Would there really be a down side doing so?

RD
 


dcollins said:
There is no "spell used in the enhancement process". Crafting magic armor & weapons is not based on any spell prerequisite.

Granted for Arms and Armor there isn't for the base plus, but there is when crafting wonderous items, such as bracers, which technically this would fall under.

RD
 

Lasher Dragon said:
Well, then you have wizards/sorcerors/monks walking around in full-plate that just happens to be made of cotton :lol:

Just like in Neverwinter Nights...I'll allow it! Uses up the armor slot, works like armor, does not technically count as armor or require feats to wear, no base armor bonus. Treat it like a robe.

Robe of the archmagi gives +5 AB to AC, and it's not armor, so I'd think it's already demonstrated by example in core.
 


Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top