dkilgo
First Post
kreynolds said:
If the designers have ever stated that a natural enhancement bonus increases the hardness and hit points of a weapon, then this is news to me. Do you happen to have a referrence? I'd be interested in seeing their interpretation, or ruling.
My stance being "more valid" than what? Than the designers opinions? Yours? All of the above? I just want to make sure I don't misunderstand you.
However, your assertion that my opinion isn't as valid as the text isn't very relevant. The text is what is in question here. Your opinions are having more of an impact on my viewpoint than the text, primarily because the text itself doesn't provide any clarification, and it doesn't directly support your own viewpoint either. It only leaves everything open to interpretation. If the text was that clear, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Furthermore, if the text was that clear, this problem would have been solved after your first, maybe second post, as you are very good at remembering the specifics in the rules. The mere fact that you have no more concrete evidence to provide than myself only further proves how non-specific the PH text is.
I think its just as likely that either one of us is right on this, so please don't think that I'm claiming you are wrong, because I'm not. I see your viewpoint as a solid interpretation, but no more or less as solid as mine. I just prefer mine, is all.
I'm not trying to be confrontational, I promise. I'm just defending my viewpoint here.
Hope you had a good holiday too.
Very good retort.
I am very interested to see what Caliban might have to add to this discussion because everybodies opinions are seeming to affect my judgement on this ruling as well. But, I am still leaning towards my interpretation of the afore metioned rule.
