Enevhar Aldarion
Hero
A hundred years ago everybody was too busy fighting WWI or staying out of it.
And, unfortunately, one of the big spreaders of the flu were all the soldiers returning home from the war.
A hundred years ago everybody was too busy fighting WWI or staying out of it.
I feel like H1N1 was more like part 1 of the story about the boy who cried wolf
I'm going with the philosophy of business as usual. As far as I can see, the economic damage due to panic will be worse than the biological damage from virus itself. Those worried should take precautions, but everything else seems counterproductive in the long term. Biological damage will hit us now, but the economic damage could have last effects. Therefore, it is my duty not to avoid any of my usual activities, despite the potential personal risk.
Washington State has 4 independent deaths (counting the one nursing home as one event) and 270 detected; they are missing 90%+ of their cases.A very interesting (and terrifying for someone who lives in the UK) article. Thanks for posting. I think this excerpt is the most important part:
- Countries that are prepared will see a fatality rate of ~0.5% (South Korea) to 0.9% (rest of China).
- Countries that are overwhelmed will have a fatality rate between ~3%-5%
Put in another way: Countries that act fast can reduce the number of deaths by ten. And that’s just counting the fatality rate. Acting fast also drastically reduces the cases, making this even more of a no-brainer.
By failing to social distance you can be killing people.I'm going with the philosophy of business as usual. As far as I can see, the economic damage due to panic will be worse than the biological damage from virus itself. Those worried should take precautions, but everything else seems counterproductive in the long term. Biological damage will hit us now, but the economic damage could have last effects. Therefore, it is my duty not to avoid any of my usual activities, despite the potential personal risk.
Washington State has 4 independent deaths (counting the one nursing home as one event) and 270 detected; they are missing 90%+ of their cases.
UK appears to be on top of it actually. 1.6% death rate to infected is a sign they may be near saturation testing. The 6 deaths*80 multiplier is 480, and they have 324 positive tests; that is the right ballpark. 99% of tested are negative, which also looks like "saturation tests" and not just testing people who show up extremely sick and/or are travel-related to hot spots.
France has 33 deaths and 1800 detected cases. They are missing 90% of their infected.
Spain has 35 deaths and 1700 detected cases. They are missing 90% of their infected.
Germany has 2 deaths and 1100 detected cases. Looks good so far.
California has 2 deaths and 160 cases. Suspicious.
NY+NJ has 1 death and 180 cases. Also Suspicious.
So expect things to get bad in France, Spain and Washington State next. France and Spain if they shut down everything today will still have a bad time. Washington State could be either side of the edge.
By failing to social distance you can be killing people.
"Mild" cases include lung scarring, 6+ months of rehab, etc.
If it turns out that economic damage is more than biological, it is because people did change their behaviour. This disease is on track for 4-6% death rate among infected and 50% of population infected by christmas without measures.
With measures, 1% death rate, and less than 1% of the population infected.
Read what is going on in Italien hospitals. Look at satallite pictures of Iran. Read the description of "mild" case (does not need O2 mask?!)
We can keep food, water and medicine supply lines running with social distancing. Especially in any industrialized or industrializing nation.
You going to a restaurant, or whatever, isn't going to interfere with that.
The government can juice the economy with cash when we get through this.
And yes, lots of restaurants and tourist businesses and travel businesses are going to have problems, and we are in for a recession. The length of the recession is going to vary with how effectively we shut down COVID-19. If you don't social distance and obey rules, you'll contribute to making the shut down less effective.
To put it another way, the 1918 influenza pandemic hit during a world war. It caused lots of damage. There was social distancing, shutting down gatherings, etc. But food kept flowing and the war kept fighting; the parts of the economy that needed to run kept running.