AnonymousOne
First Post
Tewligan said:It means "I like to increase my post count."
I, sir, resent that! if it was JUST "QFT" then maybe. but note that I also added something to my post ... so bugger off.
Tewligan said:It means "I like to increase my post count."
QFTTewligan said:It means "I like to increase my post count."
QFT.Doug McCrae said:QFTTewligan said:It means "I like to increase my post count."
Rechan said:Sigh.
Perhaps I shouldn't have said "Daily Life", but non-combat spells that are fantastic and more Wizard-like than artillery.
How about a spell that builds a house? A permanent house. Just "I point at the materials, and they animate and build itself." So if you have mud you get a mud hut and if you have bricks you get a little brick house, etc.
Rechan said:Sigh.
Perhaps I shouldn't have said "Daily Life", but non-combat spells that are fantastic and more Wizard-like than artillery.
How about a spell that builds a house? A permanent house. Just "I point at the materials, and they animate and build itself." So if you have mud you get a mud hut and if you have bricks you get a little brick house, etc.
I read that spell description and it just doesn't make any sense to me.Victim said:Fabricate to 'instantly' effect the craft check for building the house? http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/fabricate.htm
Lord Zardoz said:To address the first part, That would be mostly due to the disconnect between fantasy literature and D&D. Fiction authors are free to do whatever helps the story along. Dungeon Masters need to have some sort of game balance, at least among the heroes. In a gaming context, letting a player have artilery works. Letting a player have strategic nukes tends to cause problems.
To your "QFT" you added 8 words and attempted an expletive. That sir, is an increasing of your post count by one with a little grumbling on the end. I believe you should just accept that you were QFTing with no greater purpose than watching your post count ascend...[go's to check own post count...hey I'm up one more...AnonymousOne said:I, sir, resent that! if it was JUST "QFT" then maybe. but note that I also added something to my post ... so bugger off.
I believe that is a very old fantasy fandom convention, dating back to the forties or so, the reasoning works like this - In Norse mythology there are no female dwarfs --> If dwarfs are a separate species, not diminutive humans there have to be baby dwarfs --> If there are baby dwarfs then there have to be mommy dwarfs --> Then why don't the Norse recognize any female dwarfs? --> 'CAUSE THEY GOT BEARDS!!!Rechan said:Dwarf females with beards - where'd that come from? Where's the art of it? I find it intriguing.