Maxperson
Morkus from Orkus
RE #2. He's not going for his dagger. He had it in his hand the entire time. If he has to go for his dagger, then yes normal initiative would apply. In my example literally all he has to do is throw it.There are a few things at play here:
1) Does GSG actually know of the threat 30'+ away?
- If he doesn't, then sure, he has no chance of getting to DG before DG can throw the dagger - done.
2) But if he does, say someone yells a warning AS the guy is going for his dagger -
- There are ALL sorts of ways to justify simple initiative.
- For ex. DG is drawing but is spooked when a warned GSG does a full on charge brandishing a very large weapon. He hesitates and is beaten to the punch by GSG. There, justifies losing initiative within the fiction; But also
3. This is a game. DG suspects GSG, even if warned, can only cover 30ft so he throws from 40' away (which has consequences but nevermind) and he'll get the throw off before getting attacked by GSG.
I prefer to just resolve with game mechanics, when possible, as opposed to fiat winning initiative. The initial situation, and the offshoots so far in the thread, haven't shown a reason to do otherwise, IMO of course.
I get your preference. Fiat, though, is just a tool like any other in my opinion. If used impartially and fairly, it's a wonderful thing.