You know how some people say that certain choices by other players "breaks their immersion"? It's that. We're all sitting around, talking normally, typically narrating in first person, and all of the sudden somebody talks funny. It's jarring.
Okay, cool. Probably the same way I find the "box text" jarring when a GM switches from natural "ad lib" narration to a "set-piece" of narration that has a completely different cadence and tone and feel than the narration they delivered a moment before. I think, if you understand what I just said, then I understand exactly what you mean!
Makes you wonder what? The meaning of life? What Cheetos would taste like on pizza? If you left the iron on?
Hmm...42! What would Cheetos taste like on pizza? Iron?!?...what century/planet do you live in/on???...wrinkle free fabrics only my friend, also wool is not kind to my delicate skin so that makes that decision easier.
Oh...or was that throwing shade? The thing you were wondering was something disparaging, and you wanted to make that implication without actually breaking ToS by putting it into words?
Shady? Like the Slim kind? No, no, no...no disparaging meaning at all! I was just actually wondering as to what the "thing" was that was an uncomfortable rub. I don't like the "most famous AP run by the bestest ever DM ever hands down" because I find the quality of that particular narrator's "box text" is like nails on a chalkboard. Probably cause I don't enjoy flowery language when reading, or at least I think that's why now that I have watched other AP that didn't have a DM that was trying to be Tolkien. That, and I don't like Tolkien, or Martin, or Shakespeare, so...yeah. I still find the "box text' to be like a sudden immersion in an ice bath, but many GMs at least don't go all Shakespeare In The Park on my imagination.
I never encounter that problem. Maybe because my groups tend to narrate rather than act. In other words, instead of saying "Where is the McGuffin?" we might say, "I ask, 'Where is the McGuffin?" or even "I ask him where the McGuffin is."
Cool, that's kind of what I was thinking might have been the solution. Funnily enough after posting my inquiry I have watched an AP where pretty much the entire cast did it that way, and with enough consistency that I wasn't left confused about what was going on. As I alluded too in my post, as long as folks preface (or as you point out, phrase) it the right way it is either not confusing, or at least the confusion is minimized.
That said, longer back and forths might occasionally slip into a more conversational style.
I'm assuming in a normal voice? So like a sentence or two of framed speech followed by more speech that doesn't need to be framed as the participants have established there is a conversation going on? I saw that too more recently! Guess I should have just watched a few more AP before posting my question.
I suppose if it were really an issue, if somebody said something that would have important impact on the game if it were IC, but it wasn't clear whether it was, then the GM would probably ask the player which it was.
Which is generally what I see happening in AP where the partipants are unsure of what the speaker intended. Though, that interruption of narrative is also immersion breaking, though more akin to a die roll pause than a "M&M the DM box text" imagination drop kick.
A genuine thanks for the reply and clarification!
