rkwoodard said:I am going to point out that I am not a lawyer...
And where, sir, is your evidence of that?
Cheers, Al'Kelhar
(A lawyer)
rkwoodard said:I am going to point out that I am not a lawyer...
Fifth Element said:I have some strongly-held opinions about the small bits of information we have received so far about 4E. I'm not the only one who has these particular opinions, am I?
I'm desperate for validation. Does anyone share my opinion about 4E?
Wightbred said:After reading this thread I became so agitated that I joined EN World so I could post a reply.
I have a dire warning for staff at WotC: you better take note of the important opinions in this thread (especially my own).
Whether a WotC lacky validates my opinion or not will affect my purchasing decision and potentially years of my future enjoyment of the hobby.
Note my 3.x books are already stacked on a bonfire and will be burnt when 4E comes out, so don't try and tell me I can still play 3.x.
I will support your reading of the rules by pointing out that a half-blind monkey could read it in a certain way that supports your reading, and spend the next three days repeating the same thing over and over to anyone who dares to challenge my ridiculous interpretation.Cadfan said:I'd like to offer my opinion, explained in no fewer than two pages of text without paragraph spacing and with little punctuation, explaining a deadly flaw in 3e that makes certain character classes absolutely unplayable. The linchpin of my argument will be a rule that I have in fact misread. Correcting this rule completely negates my point. I will not believe that I am in error until someone personally drives to my house and diagrams the sentences in the rulebook which I have failed to understand.