D&D General Drow & Orcs Removed from the Monster Manual

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad



I agree from a logical standpoint.

From a social standpoint, I am worried that the Venn diagram of people who should write this book about orcs and the people who are excited to publish this book about orcs in the current climate is a picture of two isolated circles.
I'm not, not even a little bit. not everyone is rubbing their hands together like a cartoon villain waiting to get their racism on.
 

I don't really think WotC bypassed the problem at all by classifying gnolls and fiends. So long as you have intelligent human-like creatures that are presented as almost always evil, someone is going to feel icky about it.
My problem is that in their own setting, Eberron, gnolls aren't fiends and goblins aren't fey. It takes like one sentence to fix a lot of this stuff and they did it for minotaurs and to a lesser degree with lizardfolk.
 

This is why I so very much dislike WotC's status as the tip of the spear in the hobby. Quite frankly they don't deserve it.
Exactly. They trail far behind most other publishers when it comes to handling things like this. Ancestries and Culture was written years ago and they still just went with "species". Their own setting, Eberron, had fantastic ways to change how the "monstrous" races are handled and they ignored it. They're not leading the pack. They're barely following the pack.
 


My problem is that in their own setting, Eberron, gnolls aren't fiends and goblins aren't fey. It takes like one sentence to fix a lot of this stuff and they did it for minotaurs and to a lesser degree with lizardfolk.
Aren't all the settings "theirs?" Greyhawk, Forgotten Realms, Dark Sun, Birthright, etc., etc. all belong to WotC.
 



Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top