Infernal Teddy
Explorer
I'm starting to see Zander as a Troll...
No one gives a crap about the length of time you've held a poorly thought-out opinion. It's the opinion itself that matters.Zander said:I didn't mention it to support my argument directly, merely to illustrate that my position is one I've long held.
No, I'm not.By sarcastically describing my "ability" as "amazing", you are making an ad hominem attack which is uncalled for.
Let me ask YOU: in the presence of magic, how do you explain the science that gets used every day in a typical medieval world?<snip> the math involved in building bridges, domes, arches, aqueducts, etc.- all are based in science.
The technology level of most D&D campaigns - at least originally - is circa late 15th - early 16th century Europe. While the developments in metallurgy etc from that period were quite advanced <snip> The scientific method was in its infancy, if that, at the time in European history that most closely resembles the classic worlds of D&D.
Science is the method of investigation and the results deriving from that investigation. The term isn't cognate with the physical world.
After all, it worked in Mark Twain's excellent fantasy, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.
I think that Twain had his tongue firmly planted in his cheek. Also, IIRC, it was as a result of the protagonist having travelled back in time from the US Civil War period when bicycles had long existed and introducing them to Dark Age Britain.
"Genuine" should be taken to quality "fantasy", not "fan".
You need to learn the history of the genre.
No, WotC does.
WotC isn't disregarding fantasy...
If that were true, they would not have bungled gnomes, knights etc.
Back to hairy feet? Yah, that's sexy.Iku Rex said:DnD races nude from elfwood.
Maths isn't a science. It's a tool and a language, not a system of investigation or its conclusions.Dannyalcatraz said:Math, the language of engineering and architecture, was pretty sophisticated at that point- the foundations of algebra could be traced back to the Babylonians. Trigonometry was used by Egyptians and Mesopotamians.
No, there isn't. As I've already said, although a lot was achieved by this point, it wasn't through science. Many historians of science place the birth of science with Newton who came later (and even some historians of the subject regard Newton as too early).Dannyalcatraz said:There is really a lot of REAL science going on by the setting of a typical D&D world.
If you subject one part of the physical world to reasoned, scientific scrutiny, there's no rationale for not doing the same elsewhere. When you start to do that to magic, mythical creatures etc, the fantasy breaks down.Dannyalcatraz said:Magic isn't cognate with the physical world either- its just a method to break the rules...and you don't need to know and understand the rules to be able to break them.
Twain introduced bicycles in gentle mockery of fantasy/historical fiction. It supports my point that introducing advanced technology into fantasy upsets the imagery of fantasy. That's fine when the intention is comedic as in Twain's book. Otherwise, it's absurd. How many gamers would take seriously a paladin in full plate with a lance couched under his arm peddling his bike as furiously as he can at a dragon?Dannyalcatraz said:Yes- its a comedy, but it was also clearly fantasy- the method of time travel was being unconscious under a tree (and since he brought back artifacts of his travel, it wasn't merely a dream).
Unless you want to argue that comedic fantasy isn't fantasy, the point remains.
Tolkien cautioned against the introduction of science and technology in fantasy. Hickman and Weis even used the incompatibility as the theme of their Darksword novels and RPG.Dannyalcatraz said:As I and others have pointed out, "Genuine" fantasy has included anachronistic technology for at least 100 years..
If I detailed every mistake they made because they had attempted to rewrite fantasy without due regard for the genre, it would take too long. However, many of the points raised about gnomes, knights etc in other threads by other posters stem from this. If you go over to one of the recent threads about gnomes, you can see my own contribution. If you like, I can do a search and post a link.Dannyalcatraz said:Sure they could have. They can bungle things as trivial as punctuation and grammar, they can bungle important things as well. They've bungled lots of things. They're HUMAN. However, you've yet to tell us how they have done so in your opinion, so I'll stop there.
I'm not advancing the position that I am because I want to antagonise anyone or attract attention. I do believe sincerely in my stance as, I think, Dannyalcatraz does in his. That's not to say that either of us are trolls.Infernal Teddy said:I'm starting to see Zander as a Troll...
Zander said:Maths isn't a science. It's a tool and a language, not a system of investigation or its conclusions.
Infernal Teddy said:This is the moment where - despite the fact that I've tried to show you that none of us takes you and your point of view less serious than our own - I will no longer take you serious. You seem to know nothing about mathematics.