Mark
CreativeMountainGames.com
Eternalknight said:Off the top of my head I can't think of any other series on television that doesn't have an overiding story arc to it. Babylon 5 had it. Andromeda has it. Most have it. It's a sign of moving with the times, I guess.
If your friends jumped off a cliff...

To take that a step further, there is no reason why character-arcs cannot exist without a series-arc. These can be altered along the way, but we can certainly say that so-and-so is going to be bumped off by season X or that so-and-so will be promoted by season X, etc.
Eternalknight said:That being said, I like the temporal cold war angle. As for where are the Suliban in later episodes, and where is Captain Braxton, well that's the funny thing about timelines... apparently they can be alteredHowever, I think the temporal cold war could be an excuse for the writers to not have to follow continuity as much.
Pesky continuity!

Eternalknight said:Notice how it isn't called Star Trek: Enterprise? I think this is because it is supposed to be kind of a stand-alone show, somehow disjointed from the rest of Star Trek.
It would seem that TNG, DS9 and Voyager all shared an overlapping timeline, but TOS was much earlier, of course. That being the case, and if Enterprise is meant to also stand alone, doesn't that mean that Enterprise could follow the same no-series-arc formula? Just a thought...
