Just came from lunch with a friend that ranted how bad this one was...saying it does not even look like they are trying to do a good job is story and plot.
LordVyreth said:Just the overall concept. The next-generation crew (heh,) prevented the Enterprise from going into the past, which means that they never became the next-generation crew, which means they never existed to prevent the first-generation crew from going into the past, which means they did go into the past, which means...GIR's head explodes.
Wycen said:I figured that might be it after a little more thought.
But just because they went back in time doesn't mean they couldn't coexist...it would just be a big causality loop which they managed to escape in the first attempt. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Silver Moon said:Surprisingly pretty good, given that all previous Treks have beaten this concept to death and then some.
If they weren't doing time travel they could always fall back on the old hat of ANOTHER nameless and failing show, kryptonite. Personally I think the 'ensemble cast' needs expanding, and they need to kick this crappy story arc to the ground so that we can be introduced to the 'smaller so more personal' crew.Mark said:I think they are doing all of the time stuff because they are limited on the amount of technology they can introduce, which has always been the alternative to time when it comes to physical manifestations of plot devices.