Expert Tactician in Conjunction with Spring Attack

[DarkJester]

I'm debating the feat layout for my Psychic Warrior. He currently has Standstill, power attack, cleave, and combat relfexes. He will be taking the dodge/mobility/spring attack chain next, and often suprises his enemies (high dex, and ranks in hide/ movesilently).
Expert Tactician could be of some use:

Here is the possible situation:
A psychic warrior comes out of the shadows suprising his foes. He spring attacks in (wielding a glaive) and attacks an enemy in the back line, and spring attacks back out. During the movment in, he threatens 3 (flatfooted) enemies he again threatens them on the way out.

Would having expert tactician allow him to make attacks on them?

 

[mikebr99]

Nope... but they all get AoOs against him!

 

[DarkJester]

Well, they would, if not flatfooted. Unless they have combat reflexes as well.

 

[Caliban]

I'm debating the feat layout for my Psychic Warrior. He currently has Standstill, power attack, cleave, and combat relfexes. He will be taking the dodge/mobility/spring attack chain next, and often suprises his enemies (high dex, and ranks in hide/ movesilently).
Expert Tactician could be of some use:

Here is the possible situation:
A psychic warrior comes out of the shadows suprising his foes. He spring attacks in (wielding a glaive) and attacks an enemy in the back line, and spring attacks back out. During the movment in, he threatens 3 (flatfooted) enemies he again threatens them on the way out.

Would having expert tactician allow him to make attacks on them?

Only if he still threatens them after he has finished the spring attack. The extra attack from Expert Tactician has to come after your regular turn, and has to be a melee attack. You can't do it in the middle of your Spring Attack.

 

[DarkJester]

I was expecting something like that. With the reach weapon, I could still make use of it though, and stop with them in my threat range while backing out.

Anyone have any other suggestions for feats? I still my get E.T though.