Feats: Not enough or too many?

Feats: Not enough or too many?

  • There's no such word as "enough" in RPGs!

    Votes: 71 47.7%
  • Help! I'm DROWNING in Feats!

    Votes: 78 52.3%


log in or register to remove this ad

I think the number of feats is about where it should be, but the quality and usefulness of a lot of the feats are not. Not to mention you really have to watch what feats you allow from third party books or watch the game get unbalanced.
 

mcrow said:
I think the number of feats is about where it should be, but the quality and usefulness of a lot of the feats are not. Not to mention you really have to watch what feats you allow from third party books or watch the game get unbalanced.

Oh, I think there are some "first party" feats that could get out of hand.

Though a high ratio of the official troublemakers seem to stem from one book sitting over on the shelf next to me.

I'm glad none of my players own that book. No nymph smoochies or "donating all your possessions for the sake of better asskicking" in my campaign.
 

Psion said:
No nymph smoochies or "donating all your possessions for the sake of better asskicking" in my campaign.

Without nymph smoochies, I fail to see any motivation to continue playing. :p
 


Psion said:
Oh, I think there are some "first party" feats that could get out of hand.

True, but there is a much higher % in Third party books IMO. We all know WoTC is no where near perfect.
 
Last edited:


Psion said:
Oh, I think there are some "first party" feats that could get out of hand.

Though a high ratio of the official troublemakers seem to stem from one book sitting over on the shelf next to me.

I'm glad none of my players own that book. No nymph smoochies or "donating all your possessions for the sake of better asskicking" in my campaign.

Nymph smoochies??? Where? Where?

-The Gneech :cool:
 



Remove ads

Top